Literature DB >> 8837843

Thresholds in chemical carcinogenesis.

I F Purchase1, T R Auton.   

Abstract

It is common practice to base carcinogenic risk assessment on the view that there is no threshold for chemical carcinogenesis. In this context, the threshold is defined as a dose below which no effects are observed. Analysis of epidemiological and experimental data on chemical carcinogenesis confirms that no thresholds have been demonstrated in human or animal studies, including the ED01 study which used very large group sizes. Indeed, demonstrating a threshold by experiment is as difficult as proving a negative. Mechanistic data provide the justification for the assertion that thresholds do not exist in chemical carcinogeneses. This is commonly thought of as a dose-response relationship which is linear at low dose. It is noted that primary sites of action for other forms of toxicity--for example, inhibition of enzymes or occupation of receptors--also have a dose-response relationship which is linear at low dose. It is concluded that the use of differing methods of low-dose risk assessment for different toxicological endpoints is not justified. The same method should be used in order to provide symmetry in assessment of different risks; the influence of assumptions, such as the magnitude of safety factors or the mathematical model selected, should be clearly stated so that risk managers can make balanced judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8837843     DOI: 10.1006/rtph.1995.0001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  4 in total

1.  Detoxication strategy of epoxide hydrolase-the basis for a novel threshold for definable genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Franz Oesch; Jan Georg Hengstler; Michael Arand
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-01

Review 2.  Using systematic reviews for hazard and risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Anna Beronius; Laura N Vandenberg
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  Topics in cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  S S Olin; D A Neumann; J A Foran; G J Scarano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  A proposal to improve clarity and communication in the EU Classification process for chemicals for carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity.

Authors:  J E Doe
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.446

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.