Literature DB >> 8837616

Structure-based rescue of common tumor-derived p53 mutants.

A M Wieczorek1, J L Waterman, M J Waterman, T D Halazonetis.   

Abstract

The p53 tumor suppressor protein induces cell-cycle arrest or cell death in response to DNA-damaging agents, such as radiation and many of the chemotherapeutics used in cancer therapy. The function of p53 is dependent on its ability to bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner, but in one-half of all human tumors, its sequence-specific DNA binding domain is compromised by single-amino acid substitutions. The nature of these substitutions, which target residues that directly contact DNA or that stabilize the structure of the DNA binding domain, has raised concerns as to whether the function of p53 mutants could ever be rescued. Nevertheless, pharmaceuticals that restore function to p53 mutants could specifically suppress proliferation of cancer cells in patients. To determine whether tumor-derived p53 mutants are irreversibly inactivated, we introduced basic residues in their DNA binding domains, aiming to establish novel contacts between p53 and the DNA phosphate backbone. In three of the seven most common p53 mutants, replacement of Thr284 with Arg significantly enhanced DNA binding affinity, without affecting DNA binding specificity, and rescued their transactivation and tumor suppressor functions. Thus, many tumor-derived p53 mutants retain their sequence-specific DNA binding determinants and can be activated to suppress tumor growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8837616     DOI: 10.1038/nm1096-1143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


  29 in total

1.  Phosphorylation of Ser-20 mediates stabilization of human p53 in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  N H Chehab; A Malikzay; E S Stavridi; T D Halazonetis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mechanism of rescue of common p53 cancer mutations by second-site suppressor mutations.

Authors:  P V Nikolova; K B Wong; B DeDecker; J Henckel; A R Fersht
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  In vitro evolution of thermostable p53 variants.

Authors:  I Matsumura; A D Ellington
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  The mutational status of p53 can influence its recognition by human T-cells.

Authors:  Katerina Shamalov; Shlomo N Levy; Miryam Horovitz-Fried; Cyrille J Cohen
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 8.110

5.  Factors governing loss and rescue of DNA binding upon single and double mutations in the p53 core domain.

Authors:  Jon D Wright; Sergey Yu Noskov; Carmay Lim
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Change in oligomerization specificity of the p53 tetramerization domain by hydrophobic amino acid substitutions.

Authors:  E S Stavridi; N H Chehab; L C Caruso; T D Halazonetis
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Semirational design of active tumor suppressor p53 DNA binding domain with enhanced stability.

Authors:  P V Nikolova; J Henckel; D P Lane; A R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reactivation of mutant p53 through interaction of a C-terminal peptide with the core domain.

Authors:  G Selivanova; L Ryabchenko; E Jansson; V Iotsova; K G Wiman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Suppression of familial adenomatous polyposis by CP-31398, a TP53 modulator, in APCmin/+ mice.

Authors:  Chinthalapally V Rao; Malisetty V Swamy; Jagan M R Patlolla; Levy Kopelovich
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  New p53-based anti-cancer therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  K G Wiman
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.