OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether dogs are naturally infected with Ehrlichia chaffeensis. ANIMALS: 74 dogs from 5 animal shelters and 1 kennel in 3 cities and 3 counties in southeastern Virginia were tested during June 1991. PROCEDURE: Blood was drawn from 74 dogs; 73 were tested serologically for antibodies reactive to E chaffeensis and E canis, and 38 were tested for the presence of E chaffeensis, E canis, and E ewingii by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Serologic testing by indirect fluorescent antibody assay. Nested PCR used Ehrlichia wide outside primers to detect initial products, followed by use of species-specific primers for identification. RESULTS: 28 (38.4%) dogs had a positive test result (minimum titer, > or = 1:64) for antibodies reactive to E chaffeensis, and 28 (38.4%) had a positive reaction to E canis. PCR analysis indicated that 8 (42.1%) dogs were positive for E chaffeensis and 6 dogs (31.6%) were positive for E ewingii. All dogs had negative results of the PCR test for E canis. CONCLUSION: Dogs are potential reservoirs of E chaffeensis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Canine E chaffeensis infection may be more prevalent than E canis or E ewingii infection in this region of the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether dogs are naturally infected with Ehrlichia chaffeensis. ANIMALS: 74 dogs from 5 animal shelters and 1 kennel in 3 cities and 3 counties in southeastern Virginia were tested during June 1991. PROCEDURE: Blood was drawn from 74 dogs; 73 were tested serologically for antibodies reactive to E chaffeensis and E canis, and 38 were tested for the presence of E chaffeensis, E canis, and E ewingii by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Serologic testing by indirect fluorescent antibody assay. Nested PCR used Ehrlichia wide outside primers to detect initial products, followed by use of species-specific primers for identification. RESULTS: 28 (38.4%) dogs had a positive test result (minimum titer, > or = 1:64) for antibodies reactive to E chaffeensis, and 28 (38.4%) had a positive reaction to E canis. PCR analysis indicated that 8 (42.1%) dogs were positive for E chaffeensis and 6 dogs (31.6%) were positive for E ewingii. All dogs had negative results of the PCR test for E canis. CONCLUSION:Dogs are potential reservoirs of E chaffeensis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Canine E chaffeensis infection may be more prevalent than E canis or E ewingii infection in this region of the United States.
Authors: Maria Margarida Santos-Silva; Rita Sousa; Ana Sofia Santos; Pedro Melo; Victor Encarnação; Fátima Bacellar Journal: Exp Appl Acarol Date: 2006-08-03 Impact factor: 2.132
Authors: Michael J Yabsley; Andrea S Varela; Cynthia M Tate; Vivien G Dugan; David E Stallknecht; Susan E Little; William R Davidson Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 6.883