Literature DB >> 8834555

Seasonal variation in the time to pregnancy: avoiding bias by using the date of onset.

A M Stolwijk1, H Straatman, G A Zielhuis, P H Jongbloet.   

Abstract

To study seasonality in human fecundability, measured indirectly by time to the first pregnancy, we used data from 18,970 French-Canadian women who married for the first time during the 17th or 18th century. The time to pregnancy was approximated by the interval between marriage and first birth minus 38 weeks. We used the week of marriage and the week of conception as references to study seasonality. We found a minor seasonal pattern in time to pregnancy when using the week of marriage as a reference. The proportions of women with a short time to pregnancy were highest during December-January and June-July, indicating that these may be the most fecund periods. In contrast, we found an obvious seasonal pattern when using the date of conception as a reference. This pattern can be largely explained by a strong seasonal pattern in pregnancy planning (in this case, in marriages). When studying seasonal variation in the time to pregnancy, the date of onset of the time to pregnancy should be used as reference, not the date of conception. Otherwise, results will be biased owing to seasonality in pregnancy planning. The same is true for studies on seasonally bound exposures in relation to time to pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8834555     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199603000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  5 in total

1.  Decline and loss of birth seasonality in Spain: analysis of 33,421,731 births over 60 years.

Authors:  Ramón Cancho-Candela; Jesús María Andrés-de Llano; Julio Ardura-Fernández
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Seasonal patterns in fecundability in North America and Denmark: a preconception cohort study.

Authors:  Amelia K Wesselink; Lauren A Wise; Elizabeth E Hatch; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Henrik T Sørensen; Anders H Riis; Craig J McKinnon; Kenneth J Rothman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Epidemiologic tools to study the influence of environmental factors on fecundity and pregnancy-related outcomes.

Authors:  Rémy Slama; Ferran Ballester; Maribel Casas; Sylvaine Cordier; Merete Eggesbø; Carmen Iniguez; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Claire Philippat; Sylvie Rey; Stéphanie Vandentorren; Martine Vrijheid
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Fecundability and parental exposure to ambient sulfur dioxide.

Authors:  J Dejmek; R Jelínek; I Solansky'; I Benes; R J Srám
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Changing seasonal variation in births by sociodemographic factors: a population-based register study.

Authors:  J Dahlberg; G Andersson
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-09-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.