Literature DB >> 8834084

Evaluation of the 10% rescreen of negative gynecologic smears as a quality assurance measure.

S O Tabbara1, M K Sidawy.   

Abstract

The CLIA '88 regulations require the laboratory to review at least 10% of the gynecologic cases interpreted as negative that are examined by each cytotechnologist. The review must include negative cases selected at random and from patients identified as a high risk group. To evaluate the validity of this regulation, we reviewed the results of the 10% rescreen over a 24-mo period. The rescreening by pathologists detected epithelial abnormalities in 4/2,124 negative cases (0.18%). Subsequently, biopsy-proven squamous intraepithelial lesions were found in all four cases. Three different cytotechnologists were responsible for the four false-negative interpretations. Our results show that 10% rescreen of negative smears may detect a few false-negative cases. However, it is a time-consuming and inefficient mean to evaluate the performance of cytotechnologists. Quality control in gynecologic cytopathology is essential, but it is equally important that laboratories concentrate their resources and energy on methods proven to be effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8834084     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199602)14:1<84::AID-DC17>3.0.CO;2-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cervical premalignant lesions and their management.

Authors:  Faruk M Köse; Murat M Naki
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2014-06-01

2.  Use of a laboratory information system driven tool for pre-signout quality assurance of random cytopathology reports.

Authors:  Sonal Kamat; Anil V Parwani; Walid E Khalbuss; Sara E Monaco; Susan M Kelly; Luke T Wiehagen; Anthony L Piccoli; Karen M Lassige; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-08-27

3.  Economic evaluation of DNA ploidy analysis vs liquid-based cytology for cervical screening.

Authors:  V T Nghiem; K R Davies; J R Beck; M Follen; C MacAulay; M Guillaud; S B Cantor
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.