Literature DB >> 8833554

Patient-controlled analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia plus continuous infusion after hip replacement surgery.

M A Smythe1, M P O'Donnell, R F Schad, C F Dmuchowski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and adverse effect profile of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus PCA plus continuous infusion (PCACI) after hip replacement surgery.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open pilot study.
SETTING: Large teaching institution. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four patients undergoing hip replacement or revision of hip replacement surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive PCA morphine: 1 mg with 6-minute lockout, or PCACI, using the same dose, with a 0.5-1 mg/h continuous infusion. Pain intensity, sedation, narcotic use, injection/attempt ratio (I/A), and adverse effects were assessed.
RESULTS: No significant differences in pain intensity were identified. Morphine use was not different between groups: PCA 61.8 +/- 35.0 and PCACI 74.2 +/- 54.9 mg (p =0.394). A trend toward an increased 12-hour I/A ratio was evident in the PCACI group: PCA 0.73 +/- 0.18 and PCACI 0.86 +/- 0.17 (p =0.073). Patient-reported adverse effects, sedation, and inability to sleep secondary to pain occurred similarly. Eight of 18 PCACI patients required discontinuation of either the continuous infusion mode or of PCA therapy entirely secondary to adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS: When compared with PCA therapy, PCACI was not associated with improved pain control and more patients receiving PCACI required discontinuation of therapy secondary to adverse effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8833554     DOI: 10.1177/106002809603000302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  4 in total

1.  Capnography monitoring enhances safety of postoperative patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  Thomas McCarter; Zakir Shaik; Keith Scarfo; Laura J Thompson
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2008-06

2.  A comparison of 2 intravenous patient-controlled analgesia modes after spinal fusion surgery: Constant-rate background infusion versus variable-rate feedback infusion, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Lee; Chong Wha Baek; Hyun Kang; Yong-Hee Park; Geun Joo Choi; Yong Hun Jung; Young Cheol Woo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  The Optimizing Background Infusion Mode Decreases Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesic Volume and Opioid Consumption Compared to Fixed-Rate Background Infusion in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study.

Authors:  Ki Tae Jung; Keum Young So; Seung Un Kim; Sang Hun Kim
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Effect of Nefopam-Based Patient-Controlled Analgesia with and without Fentanyl on Postoperative Pain Intensity in Patients Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Non-Inferiority Trial.

Authors:  Ki Tae Jung; Keum Young So; Seung Chul Kim; Sang Hun Kim
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.