Literature DB >> 8833361

Endoscopic treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ: long-term outcome and factors.

L E Hammarstrom1, T Holmin, H Stridbeck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in elderly and/or high-risk patients with common bile duct calculi (CBD) and the gallbladder in situ should be followed by routine cholecystectomy is still a subject of controversy.
METHODS: To identify factors predictive of subsequent biliary tract symptoms after EST and bile duct clearance, we reviewed 265 patients with intact gallbladder and CBD calculi who were considered for EST in our department from 1981 to 1992. In 15 of 265 patients endoscopic treatment was not carried out, and the records of 4 patients were missing.
RESULTS: Complete removal of all bile duct calculi failed in 27 patients (11%). Cholecystectomy was performed in 35 patients (16%) with cleared bile ducts 1-765 days (median, 60 days) after EST, in spite of absence of recurrent symptoms from the biliary tract. The remaining 184 patients have been retrospectively followed up for 14-150 months (median, 69 months). Cholecystectomy was required in 35 because of acute cholecystitis (n = 23) or biliary colic (n = 12). Of the cholecystectomies 86% were performed within 24 months after EST and only one after 4 years of follow-up. Increased frequency of cholecystectomy was found in patients with complete opacification of the gallbladder at endoscopic cholangiography (p = 0.005). This was especially evident in patients younger than 80 years (p = 0.002). Cholecystectomy was also required more often in patients with gallbladder calculi (p = 0.02). The risk of cholangitis in patients without recurrent stones was higher in those with juxtapapillary diverticula (p = 0.02). Fifty-nine patients without and 17 with mild to moderate symptoms from the biliary tract died after a median time of 39 and 46 months, respectively. Seventy-three patients are alive, and 59 are symptom-free. Ten patients have had and four still have complaints of mild to moderate biliary tract symptoms. They have been followed for up to 16-146 months (median, 40 months).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm that endoscopic treatment alone in this group of patients is a feasible treatment principle. Recognition of the registered risk factors might be helpful when selecting patients for subsequent cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8833361     DOI: 10.3109/00365529609004881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  12 in total

1.  Is cholecystectomy necessary after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones in patients older than 80 years of age?

Authors:  Takaharu Yasui; Shunichi Takahata; Hiroshi Kono; Yosuke Nagayoshi; Yasuhisa Mori; Kosuke Tsutsumi; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Takao Ohtsuka; Masafumi Nakamura; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Expectant treatment or cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis in patients over 80 years old?

Authors:  C M Pring; L Skelding-Millar; R J R Goodall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Risk factors of acute cholecystitis after endoscopic common bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Jun Kyu Lee; Ji Kon Ryu; Joo Kyung Park; Won Jae Yoon; Sang Hyub Lee; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Yong-Tae Kim; Yong Bum Yoon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The fate of patients who undergo "preoperative" ERCP to clear known or suspected bile duct stones.

Authors:  M F Byrne; M T McLoughlin; R M Mitchell; H Gerke; T N Pappas; M S Branch; P S Jowell; J Baillie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Long-term follow-up study of gallbladder in situ after endoscopic common duct stone removal in Korean patients.

Authors:  Mei Lan Cui; Joon Hyun Cho; Tae Nyeun Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Outcomes of cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Nechol L Allen; Ruth R Leeth; Kelly R Finan; Darren S Tishler; Selwyn M Vickers; C Mel Wilcox; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Timing of cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Anandi H W Schiphorst; Marc G H Besselink; Djamila Boerma; Robin Timmer; Marinus J Wiezer; Karel J van Erpecum; Ivo A M J Broeders; Bert van Ramshorst
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis: the protective role of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  E J M van Geenen; D L van der Peet; C J J Mulder; M A Cuesta; M J Bruno
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Risk factors for cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder stones after endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kang-Moon Lee; Chang Nyol Paik; Woo Chul Chung; Jin Dong Kim; Cheong Rok Lee; Jin Mo Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A nationwide population-based study of common bile duct stone recurrence after endoscopic stone removal in Korea.

Authors:  Byung Kyu Park; Jeong Hun Seo; Han Ho Jeon; Jong Won Choi; Sun Young Won; Yong Suk Cho; Chun Kyon Lee; Haeyong Park; Dong Wook Kim
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.