Literature DB >> 8833304

Factors in implant integration failure after bone grafting: an osteometric and endocrinologic matched analysis.

J E Blomqvist1, P Alberius, S Isaksson, A Linde, B G Hansson.   

Abstract

In a retrospective analysis of 49 patients who received bone graft augmentation to the maxillary sinuses in conjunction with implant insertion, 11 patients had a significantly reduced success rate. The aim of the present study was to determine whether bone quality, as assessed by osteometry and selected haematologic and urinary tests, influences the integration of implants, and whether such data can be prognostically useful. Relative bone mass density (BMD%) differed significantly among these patients as compared to age- and sex-matched control patients receiving the same reconstructive treatment (P=0.01). Other parameters tested did not demonstrate any significant differences. In addition to local complications, general disorders, such as osteoporosis, must be considered in cases of excessive implant loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8833304     DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(96)80015-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of mandibular bone mineral density using the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry technique in edentulous subjects living in an endemic fluorosis region.

Authors:  U S Buyukkaplan; M U Guldag
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Dental implants in patients affected by systemic diseases.

Authors:  N Donos; E Calciolari
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Effect of a dietary supplement on peri-implant bone strength in a rat model of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Takahiro Takahashi; Takehiro Watanabe; Hiroshi Nakada; Yasuhiro Tanimoto; Suguru Kimoto; Dindo Q Mijares; Yu Zhang; Yasuhiko Kawai
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 4.642

Review 4.  Significance of osteoporosis in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  B Hohlweg-Majert; R Schmelzeisen; B M Pfeiffer; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The effect of osteopenia on the osteointegration of different biomaterials: histomorphometric study in rats.

Authors:  M Fini; G Giavaresi; N N Aldini; P Torricelli; G Morrone; G A Guzzardella; R Giardino; A Krajewski; A Ravaglioli; M M Belmonte; A D Benedittis; G Biagini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  The relationship between implant stability and bone health markers in post-menopausal women with bisphosphonate exposure.

Authors:  Pamela Taxel; Denise Ortiz; David Shafer; David Pendrys; Susan Reisine; Kandasamy Rengasamy; Martin Freilich
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparison of implant survival with implants placed in acceptable and compromised bone: a literature review.

Authors:  Stefan Ihde; Sigmar Kopp; Thomas Maier
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-06-10

8.  Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants in a rat model of osteoporosis using multilayer bone mesenchymal stem cell sheets.

Authors:  Yan Duan; Wei Ma; Dehua Li; Tongfei Wang; Baolin Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 9.  Surface modification of biomedical and dental implants and the processes of inflammation, wound healing and bone formation.

Authors:  Clark M Stanford
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Mandibular bone mineral density in patients with Behçet's disease.

Authors:  Fatih Asutay; Yusuf Atalay; Ahmet Hüseyin Acar; Hilal Asutay; Selma Eroğlu; Muammer Çağrı Burdurlu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.