Literature DB >> 8832248

Rear foot inversion/eversion during gait relative to the subtalar joint neutral position.

M R Pierrynowski1, S B Smith.   

Abstract

Clinicians often fabricate foot orthotic devices at the subtalar joint neutral position (STNP) to mimic the position of the rear foot during midstance. However, rear foot motion during gait, relative to the resting standing foot position, not the STNP, is often reported in the literature. The motion of the rear foot relative to a valid estimate of the STNP is unknown. In this study, six experienced foot care specialists manually placed the rear part of the feet of nine subjects at the STNP seven or eight times to obtain a valid estimate of each subject's STNP. The worst-case mean and 95% confidence interval of the STNP estimate for any one subject was 0.0 degree +/- 0.7 degree. These nine subjects then walked on a motor-driven treadmill, set at 0.89 meters/sec, and three-dimensional estimates of each subject's rear foot inversion/eversion motion were obtained, then averaged over 6 to 26 strides. For most subjects, the rear foot was always everted during stance with mean and standard deviation maximal eversion (7.2 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees) occurring at 44% of the total gait cycle. The inversion/eversion orientation during swing was characterized by 1 degree to 2 degrees of eversion, with a small amount of inversion in early swing. These findings have implications for the fabrication of foot orthoses, since the rear foot is rarely near the STNP during stance.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8832248     DOI: 10.1177/107110079601700709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  10 in total

1.  An investigation of a reference posture used in determining rearfoot kinematics for both healthy and patellofemoral pain syndrome individuals.

Authors:  Pazit Levinger; Wendy Gilleard
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Human standing and walking: comparison of the effects of stimulation of the vestibular system.

Authors:  John F Iles; Richard Baderin; Rachel Tanner; Ariel Simon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Arch height and maximum rearfoot eversion during jogging in 2 static neutral positions.

Authors:  Sae Yong Lee; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Inter-assessor reliability of practice based biomechanical assessment of the foot and ankle.

Authors:  Hannah L Jarvis; Christopher J Nester; Richard K Jones; Anita Williams; Peter D Bowden
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Foot kinematics in patients with two patterns of pathological plantar hyperkeratosis.

Authors:  Christopher J Nester; Peter Bowker; Andrew H Findlow
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Comparison of foot orthoses made by podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Nick A Guldemond; Pieter Leffers; Nicolaas C Schaper; Antal P Sanders; Fred H M Nieman; Geert H I M Walenkamp
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  A radiographic and anthropometric study of the effect of a contoured sandal and foot orthosis on supporting the medial longitudinal arch.

Authors:  Carles Escalona-Marfil; Thomas G McPoil; Rebecca Mellor; Bill Vicenzino
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function.

Authors:  Hannah L Jarvis; Christopher J Nester; Peter D Bowden; Richard K Jones
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Different weight shift trainings can improve the balance performance of patients with a chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wan-Chun Liao; Chung-Liang Lai; Pi-Shan Hsu; Kun-Chung Chen; Chun-Hou Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view.

Authors:  Mikel L Reilingh; Lijkele Beimers; Gabriëlle J M Tuijthof; Sjoerd A S Stufkens; Mario Maas; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.