Literature DB >> 8831567

Hydrostatic pressure has different effects on the assembly of tubulin, actin, myosin II, vinculin, talin, vimentin, and cytokeratin in mammalian tissue cells.

H C Crenshaw1, J A Allen, V Skeen, A Harris, E D Salmon.   

Abstract

Hydrostatic pressures in the range of hundreds of atmospheres are known to disrupt cytoskeletal organization in tissue culture cells, with profound changes in cell shape. The molecular mechanisms of these effects are poorly understood. To determine the effect of pressure on the cytoskeleton, and thus to provide better indicators of the molecular mechanisms, we used fluorescent antibody staining to compare the organizations of seven different cytoskeletal proteins in HeLa cells and rat osteosarcoma cells (ROS-17/2.8) subjected to different pressures up to 400 atm. Pressures of 300 atm or more caused cells of both lines to "round up" and to withdraw their lamellar extensions. However, this response varied within a population of cells, with some cells remaining spread at pressures that caused their neighbors to round up. The most resistant to rounding were those cells touching other cells, and the occasional giant cells. As expected, the rounded cells showed disruption of actin stress fibers and of vinculin and talin at focal contacts. The unrounded cells showed less disruption in the organization of these same proteins. Microtubules and myosin II filaments appeared resistant to 400 atm pressure in both cell types, whether rounded or unrounded. However, in HeLa cells, the intermediate filaments, vimentin and cytokeratin, depolymerized and formed small vesicles when pressures exceeded 200 atm, and this occurred in rounded as well as unrounded cells. In osteosarcoma cells, which do not have cytokeratin, vimentin did not depolymerize. We discuss different mechanisms that might explain these responses to pressure, including direct effects on the equilibria of protein polymerization and less direct effects on regulatory mechanisms, such as phosphorylation pathways, that control cytoskeletal organization. The later type of explanation seems more consistent with both the variability of response within cell populations and the difference in vimentin's response in one cell line compared with the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8831567     DOI: 10.1006/excr.1996.0278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Cell Res        ISSN: 0014-4827            Impact factor:   3.905


  11 in total

1.  Temporal changes in cytoskeletal organisation within isolated chondrocytes quantified using a novel image analysis technique.

Authors:  M M Knight; B D Idowu; D A Lee; D L Bader
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Piezotolerance of the cytoskeletal structure in cultured deep-sea fish cells using DNA transfection and protein introduction techniques.

Authors:  Sumihiro Koyama; Masuo Aizawa
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Effects of the piezo-tolerance of cultured deep-sea eel cells on survival rates, cell proliferation, and cytoskeletal structures.

Authors:  Sumihiro Koyama; Hiromi Kobayashi; Akira Inoue; Tetsuya Miwa; Masuo Aizawa
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Responses of different cell lines from ocular tissues to elevated hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  M B Wax; G Tezel; S Kobayashi; M R Hernandez
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Trace Elemental Analysis of the Exoskeleton, Leg Muscle, and Gut of Three Hadal Amphipods.

Authors:  Lingyue Zhu; Daoqiang Geng; Bingbing Pan; Wenhao Li; Shouwen Jiang; Qianghua Xu
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Chromosome rearrangements and survival of androgenetic rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  K Ocalewicz; S Dobosz; H Kuzminski; J Nowosad; K Goryczko
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.653

7.  Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on bacterial growth on human ossicles explanted from cholesteatoma patients.

Authors:  Steffen Dommerich; Hagen Frickmann; Jürgen Ostwald; Tobias Lindner; Andreas Erich Zautner; Kathleen Arndt; Hans Wilhelm Pau; Andreas Podbielski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Infectious causes of cholesteatoma and treatment of infected ossicles prior to reimplantation by hydrostatic high-pressure inactivation.

Authors:  Wycliffe Omurwa Masanta; Rebecca Hinz; Andreas Erich Zautner
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Interleukin-6 expression under gravitational stress due to vibration and hypergravity in follicular thyroid cancer cells.

Authors:  Xiao Ma; Markus Wehland; Ganna Aleshcheva; Jens Hauslage; Kai Waßer; Ruth Hemmersbach; Manfred Infanger; Johann Bauer; Daniela Grimm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genes required for growth at high hydrostatic pressure in Escherichia coli K-12 identified by genome-wide screening.

Authors:  S Lucas Black; Angela Dawson; F Bruce Ward; Rosalind J Allen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.