Literature DB >> 8831308

Spinal bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: the effect of saline dilution.

B Ben-David1, H Levin, E Solomon, H Admoni, S Vaida.   

Abstract

The safety of lidocaine spinal anesthesia has recently been called into question by reports of both permanent and transient neurologic toxicity. This study explored the possibility of adapting the longer acting spinal bupivacaine to ambulatory surgery. Sixty patients presenting for ambulatory arthroscopy were randomized to four groups receiving the following spinal anesthetics: Group I (15 mg bupivacaine), 3 mL of 0.5% spinal bupivacaine in 8% dextrose; Group II (10 mg bupivacaine), 2 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine+1 mL saline; Group III (7.5 mg bupivacaine), 1.5 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine%1.5 mL saline; Group IV (5 mg bupivacaine), 1 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine+2 mL saline. Maximum block height was T-5 in Group I versus T-8 in the other groups. Onset times to peak block were similar in all groups and averaged 14 min. Time to two-segment regression, complete regression, micturition, and discharge were significantly reduced from Group I to Group II and from Group II to Group III. Reductions in times between Groups III and IV did not achieve statistical significance. Times from placement of the spinal block until discharge were 471 +/- 35, 260 +/- 15,202 +/- 14, and 181 +/- 8 min, respectively, for the four groups. The intensity of motor block decreased significantly from group to group, such that 13 of the 15 patients in Group IV failed to achieve Bromage level 2 or 3. The intensity of sensory block also decreased from group to group with four patients in Group IV having pain intraoperatively that required further treatment. Therefore, Group III provided the optimum combination of adequate depth of anesthesia and rapid recovery. The results of this study indicate that spinal anesthesia with 7.5 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine in 8% dextrose diluted with an equal volume of saline provides an acceptable spinal anesthetic for ambulatory arthroscopy with a recovery profile appropriate to the ambulatory setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8831308     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199610000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  16 in total

1.  [Spinal anaesthesia in day-case surgery. Optimisation of procedures].

Authors:  G Rätsch; H Niebergall; L Hauenstein; A Reber
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine for transurethral endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Secil Dizman; Gurkan Turker; Alp Gurbet; Elif Basagan Mogol; Suat Turkcan; Ziyaatin Karakuzu
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2011-08

3.  Does spinal anesthesia lead to postoperative urinary retention in same-day urogynecology surgery? A retrospective review.

Authors:  Alexandriah Alas; Ryan Hidalgo; Luis Espaillat; Hemikaa Devakumar; G Willy Davila; Eric Hurtado
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Ropivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia.

Authors:  Zoubir Djerada; Catherine Feliu; Yoann Cazaubon; Faouzi Smati; Philippe Gomis; Dominique Guerrot; Beny Charbit; Olivier Fernandes; Jean-Marc Malinovsky
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  The effect of body mass index on the spread of spinal block in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kari A Leino; Kristiina S Kuusniemi; Heikki K Pälve; Hannu T Tiusanen; Tapani T Tuppurainen
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 6.  [Unilateral spinal anesthesia : Literature review and recommendations].

Authors:  B Büttner; A Mansur; M Bauer; J Hinz; I Bergmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Comparison of hyperbaric ropivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine in unilateral spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  Zekiye Bigat; Neval Boztug; Bilge Karsli; Nihan Cete; Ertugrul Ertok
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  [Use of 2 % hyperbaric prilocaine for spinal anesthesia : sensitivity analysis in outpatient surgery].

Authors:  D A Vagts; C H Bley; C W Mutz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Comparison of two spinal needle types to achieve a unilateral spinal block.

Authors:  Kristiina Kuusniemi; Kari Leino; Kaarlo Lertola; Kalevi Pihlajamäki; Mikko Pitkänen
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Bilateral vs. unilateral spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopies.

Authors:  Aliye Esmaoglu; Sinan Karaoglu; Ayse Mizrak; Adem Boyaci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.