Literature DB >> 8831116

Pitfalls in the surgical management of cervical spine injuries.

S Rao1, K M Badani, K Jamieson, T Schildhauer.   

Abstract

Records of 69 cervical spine injury patients referred to the authors' institution over a 3-year period were reviewed. The senior author documented "definite" and "probable" pitfalls occurring in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative management. Diagnosis, traction, bracing, surgical timing, intraoperative technical errors, and incorrect surgical decisions were noted. Of the 69 patients, 39 (56%) suffered a pitfall of management. Twenty-seven patients (39%) accumulated 49 "definite" pitfalls between them and 12 patients (17%) suffered a total of 20 "probable" pitfalls. Of the 49 definite pitfalls, 7 (14%) were preoperative, 17 (34%) were those of surgical decision making, 21 (43%) were operative, and 4 (9%) postoperative. Diagnostic errors and incorrect bracing and traction led to neurological worsening. Intraoperatively, technical errors (30%), wrong timing of surgery (24%), and incorrect choice of operation (16%) were the common pitfalls. Postoperative pitfalls consisted of inappropriate bracing (17%). A Cervical Spine Research Society review (1989) rated complications of cervical spine surgery at 6.3% (63/992). In this study, a sizeable portion (56%) of cervical spine injury patients requiring surgery were at a risk of complications. Short of complications, there are areas of management where errors may have less well-documented undesirable effects or increase the potential for morbidity. An awareness of these pitfalls and increased use of non-operative treatment may eliminate up to 73% of the pitfalls and thereby decrease the morbidity associated with the management of cervical spine injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8831116     DOI: 10.1007/bf00395506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  Penetrating gunshot wounds of the cervical spine in civilians. Review of 38 cases.

Authors:  J S Heiden; M H Weiss; A W Rosenberg; T Kurze; M L Apuzzo
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  The syndrome of acute anterior spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R C SCHNEIDER
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1955-03       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Surgical stabilization of the cervical spine after trauma.

Authors:  E S Stauffer; M E Rhoades
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1976-06

4.  Complications of cervical spine surgery. A five-year report on a survey of the membership of the Cervical Spine Research Society by the Morbidity and Mortality Committee.

Authors:  J J Graham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The results of laminectomy in patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  T H Morgan; G W Wharton; G N Austin
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1971-05

6.  Fractures of the dens (odontoid process). An analysis of thirty-seven cases.

Authors:  J Schatzker; C H Rorabeck; J P Waddell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1971-08

7.  Cervical orthoses. A study comparing their effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects.

Authors:  R M Johnson; D L Hart; E F Simmons; G R Ramsby; W O Southwick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Complications in the treatment of acute spinal injury.

Authors:  A M Levine; C C Edwards
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Complications associated with the halo-vest. A review of 245 cases.

Authors:  J A Glaser; R Whitehill; W G Stamp; J A Jane
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Forces and motions across the neck in patients treated with halo-vest.

Authors:  B Lind; H Sihlbom; A Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  The C7 pedicle as a superior fixation point in spinal stabilization for spinal metastatic disease.

Authors:  Harjot Thind; Andrew J Fabiano
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

2.  Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3?

Authors:  Weerasak Singhatanadgige; Lukas P Zebala; Panya Luksanapruksa; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.