Literature DB >> 8831002

Bioresorbable implants--practical considerations.

W S Pietrzak1, D Sarver, M Verstynen.   

Abstract

Traditional metal implants, primarily used for internal fixation, have been used by the orthopedic surgeon for years. Decades of development have produced such devices for almost every conceivable need. Despite their widespread use, a relatively consistent set of problems or issues have been identified. These include the potential for long term migration, breakage, stress shielding, reaction to the material, interference with standard imaging techniques, and growth restriction in young patients. A number of bioresorbable polymer devices have recently become available to create a viable alternative for some indications. As expected with an evolving technology, solving one set of problems has engendered another. One of the most limiting aspects of bioresorbable polymers is their inherently lower strength compared to metals. Although more of an issue with some materials and applications than others, significant tissue reactions have been observed in some cases as well. This paper discusses the field of synthetic bioresorbable polymers in general, but with specific reference to those materials and devices that can be used in place of metal implants for internal fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8831002     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(96)00139-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  5 in total

1.  Complications of bioresorbable fixation systems in pediatric neurosurgery.

Authors:  Cherukuri Ravi Kumar; Sandeep Sood; Steven Ham
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Short-term in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of a biodegradable polyurethane foam based on 1,4-butanediisocyanate.

Authors:  B van Minnen; M B M van Leeuwen; B Stegenga; J Zuidema; C E Hissink; T G van Kooten; R R M Bos
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Comparison of reasorbeable mini anchor versus non reasorbeable: histological evaluation in an experimental rabbit model.

Authors:  Alex Pontini; Ivan Munivrana; Maria Luisa Valente; Franco Bassetto
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2013-08-11

4.  The unpredictable material properties of bioabsorbable PLC interference screws and their adverse effects in ACL reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  Sujith Konan; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Prospective, Multicenter, Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Biointegrative, Fiber-Reinforced Implant for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Luke D Cicchinelli; Jurij Štalc; Martinus Richter; Stuart Miller
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2020-11-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.