Literature DB >> 8829298

Survey questions for the measurement of induced abortion.

D Huntington, B Mensch, V C Miller.   

Abstract

Underreporting of induced abortion in survey research is a ubiquitous problem. The use of an indirect interview technique in which questions were asked about abortion in the context of unwanted pregnancy was described earlier as holding promise for increasing the response rate. This report reviews the mixed results from multicountry studies that used indirect technique. Exploratory qualitative studies are needed to identify a setting-specific context for discussing abortion. Because the subject of induced abortion is inherently sensitive, survey measurement of this practice is less precise than that of other, less controversial maternal health-care practices. This lack of precision should not deter the pursuit of the study of this critically important public-health-care concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8829298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Fam Plann        ISSN: 0039-3665


  3 in total

1.  Induced abortion, pregnancy loss and intimate partner violence in Tanzania: a population based study.

Authors:  Heidi Stöckl; Veronique Filippi; Charlotte Watts; Jessie K K Mbwambo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Interviewer effects on abortion reporting: a multilevel analysis of household survey responses in Côte d'Ivoire, Nigeria and Rajasthan, India.

Authors:  Katy Footman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Brazilian adolescents' knowledge and beliefs about abortion methods: a school-based internet inquiry.

Authors:  Ellen M H Mitchell; Silke Heumann; Ana Araujo; Leila Adesse; Carolyn Tucker Halpern
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.