Literature DB >> 8828177

Sound and vibration sensitivity of VIIIth nerve fibers in the grassfrog, Rana temporaria.

J Christensen-Dalsgaard1, M B Jørgensen.   

Abstract

We have studied the sound and vibration sensitivity of 164 amphibian papilla fibers in the VIIIth nerve of the grassfrog, Rana temporaria. The VIIIth nerve was exposed using a dorsal approach. The frogs were placed in a natural sitting posture and stimulated by free-field sound. Furthermore, the animals were stimulated with dorso-ventral vibrations, and the sound-induced vertical vibrations in the setup could be canceled by emitting vibrations in antiphase from the vibration exciter. All low-frequency fibers responded to both sound and vibration with sound thresholds from 23 dB SPL and vibration thresholds from 0.02 cm/s2. The sound and vibration sensitivity was compared for each fiber using the offset between the rate-level curves for sound and vibration stimulation as a measure of relative vibration sensitivity. When measured in this way relative vibration sensitivity decreases with frequency from 42 dB at 100 Hz to 25 dB at 400 Hz. Since sound thresholds decrease from 72 dB SPL at 100 Hz to 50 dB SPL at 400 Hz the decrease in relative vibration sensitivity reflects an increase in sound sensitivity with frequency, probably due to enhanced tympanic sensitivity at higher frequencies. In contrast, absolute vibration sensitivity is constant in most of the frequency range studied. Only small effects result from the cancellation of sound-induced vibrations. The reason for this probably is that the maximal induced vibrations in the present setup are 6-10 dB below the fibers' vibration threshold at the threshold for sound. However, these results are only valid for the present physical configuration of the setup and the high vibration-sensitivities of the fibers warrant caution whenever the auditory fibers are stimulated with free-field sound. Thus, the experiments suggest that the low-frequency sound sensitivity is not caused by sound-induced vertical vibrations. Instead, the low-frequency sound sensitivity is either tympanic or mediated through bone conduction or sound-induced pulsations of the lungs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8828177     DOI: 10.1007/bf00192311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  13 in total

1.  Directionality of auditory nerve fiber responses to pure tone stimuli in the grassfrog, Rana temporaria. I. Spike rate responses.

Authors:  M B Jørgensen; J Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Response characteristics of vibration-sensitive neurons in the midbrain of the grassfrog, Rana temporaria.

Authors:  J Christensen-Dalsgaard; M B Jørgensen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Hearing through the lungs: lung-eardrum transmission of sound in the frog Eleutherodactylus coqui.

Authors:  G Ehret; J Tautz; B Schmitz
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1990-04

4.  Tympanic and extratympanic sound transmission in the leopard frog.

Authors:  W Wilczynski; C Resler; R R Capranica
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The response characteristics of vibration-sensitive saccular fibers in the grassfrog, Rana temporaria.

Authors:  J Christensen-Dalsgaard; M B Jørgensen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Directional hearing in the grass frog (Rana temporaria L.): I. Mechanical vibrations of tympanic membrane.

Authors:  M S Vlaming; A M Aertsen; W J Epping
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Directional characteristics of the acoustic receiver of the leopard frog (Rana pipiens): a study of eighth nerve auditory responses.

Authors:  A S Feng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Biomechanics of vibration reception in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana.

Authors:  T E Hetherington
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Sound and vibration sensitivity of VIIIth nerve fibers in the frogs Leptodactylus albilabris and Rana pipiens pipiens.

Authors:  J Christensen-Dalsgaard; P M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Seismic and auditory tuning curves from bullfrog saccular and amphibian papillar axons.

Authors:  X L Yu; E R Lewis; D Feld
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  4 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Earless toads sense low frequencies but miss the high notes.

Authors:  Molly C Womack; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Luis A Coloma; Juan C Chaparro; Kim L Hoke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Directionality of the pressure-difference receiver ears in the northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens.

Authors:  Calvin C K Ho; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Hearing without a tympanic ear.

Authors:  Grace Capshaw; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.308

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.