Literature DB >> 8826685

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The voice of polite dissent.

E G Deune1, S E Mackinnon.   

Abstract

It is ironic for us that our own studies, showing that neurolysis of the median nerve does not confer benefit in the primary OCTR, have been cited frequently as a reason for not needing to visualize the median nerve and that this indirectly has supported ECTR. Our recognition that even OCTR can cause significant complications that may not be able to be corrected, however, makes us very respectful of carpal tunnel release, a procedure that has been called the simplest of all operations. We, therefore, reject any modification that in any way presents more risk to even a single patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8826685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Plast Surg        ISSN: 0094-1298            Impact factor:   2.017


  2 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of reporting return to work in studies comparing open with endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Olubimpe Ayeni; Achilleas Thoma; Ted Haines; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2005

2.  A Comparison of Changes in Median Nerve Cross-sectional Area Between Endoscopic and Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release.

Authors:  William R Smith; David C Hirsch; David O Osei-Hwedieh; Robert J Goitz; John Fowler
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2019-10-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.