Literature DB >> 8826471

Molecular fragile X screening in normal populations.

W C Spence1, S H Black, L Fallon, A Maddalena, E Cummings, G Menapace-Drew, D P Bick, G Levinson, J D Schulman, P N Howard-Peebles.   

Abstract

In December, 1993, we initiated a pilot project in which DNA fragile X (fraX) testing was offered during routine prenatal or genetic counseling to all pregnant women seen at the Genetics & IVF Institute, most of whom were referred for the indication of advanced maternal age. A brochure on fragile X syndrome was sent to each patient prior to her appointment and was reviewed by a counselor or physician during the counseling session. As of June 1995, 3,345 patients were offered testing; 474 women with no identified family history of mental retardation or learning disability and 214 women with a positive family history accepted the test on a self-pay basis. The second population screened was 271 potential donors in our anonymous egg donor program. DNA from blood was tested by Southern blot using EcoRI/EagI and StB12.3. If an expansion was detected, CGG repeat number was determined by PCR-based analysis. Among the 474 patients with unremarkable family histories, three fraX carriers were identified (repeat sizes = 60+), whereas none were found in the 214 patients with a positive family history. Among the potential egg donors, two high borderline patients were identified (repeat sizes = between 50 and 59). Our ongoing study indicates that screening of pregnant or preconceptual populations for fraX carrier status using DNA testing is accepted by many patients and is an important addition to current medical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8826471     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960712)64:1<181::AID-AJMG31>3.0.CO;2-H

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  10 in total

1.  Duty to re-contact: a study of families at risk for Fragile X.

Authors:  Lynn E Bernard; Barbara McGillivray; Margot I Van Allen; J M Friedman; Sylvie Langlois
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Carrier screening in preconception consultation in primary care.

Authors:  Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-12-20

3.  Fragile X premutations are not a major cause of early menopause.

Authors:  A Kenneson; D W Cramer; S T Warren
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Fragile-X carrier screening and the prevalence of premutation and full-mutation carriers in Israel.

Authors:  H Toledano-Alhadef; L Basel-Vanagaite; N Magal; B Davidov; S Ehrlich; V Drasinover; E Taub; G J Halpern; N Ginott; M Shohat
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Prevalence and phenotype consequence of FRAXA and FRAXE alleles in a large, ethnically diverse, special education-needs population.

Authors:  D C Crawford; K L Meadows; J L Newman; L F Taft; D L Pettay; L B Gold; S J Hersey; E F Hinkle; M L Stanfield; P Holmgreen; M Yeargin-Allsopp; C Boyle; S L Sherman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Intermediate CGG repeat length at the FMR1 locus is not associated with hormonal indicators of ovarian age.

Authors:  Jennie K Kline; Ann M Kinney; Bruce Levin; Stephen A Brown; Andrew G Hadd; Dorothy Warburton
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  FMR1 and the fragile X syndrome: human genome epidemiology review.

Authors:  D C Crawford; J M Acuña; S L Sherman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Offering fragile X syndrome carrier screening: a prospective mixed-methods observational study comparing carrier screening of pregnant and non-pregnant women in the general population.

Authors:  M Martyn; V Anderson; A Archibald; R Carter; J Cohen; M Delatycki; S Donath; J Emery; J Halliday; M Hill; L Sheffield; H Slater; F Tassone; S Younie; S Metcalfe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  FMR1 CGG allele size and prevalence ascertained through newborn screening in the United States.

Authors:  Flora Tassone; Ka Pou Iong; Tzu-Han Tong; Joyce Lo; Louise W Gane; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Danh Nguyen; Lisa Y Mu; Jennifer Laffin; Don B Bailey; Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  In the Gray Zone in the Fragile X Gene: What are the Key Unanswered Clinical and Biological Questions?

Authors:  Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y)       Date:  2014-06-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.