Literature DB >> 8826066

Does testing for depression influence diagnosis or management by general practitioners?

C Dowrick1.   

Abstract

This study set out to assess the effects on diagnosis and management of providing general practitioners with feedback of patients' scores on a depression screening instrument. One hundred and sixteen general practice attenders aged 16-64 with undetected depression were identified using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The BDI scores of a random 45% were disclosed to the general practitioners. Subjects and medical casenotes were reviewed over 12 months. Thirty-one (27%) of subjects were later diagnosed as depressed. Rates of diagnosis were higher in the disclosed group, but only after six months. Rates of intention to treat were low, but were marginally higher for the disclosed group; they were much higher for patients diagnosed by the doctors themselves. Feedback of screening questionnaire results appears to be of limited value in enhancing general practitioners' detection or management of depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8826066     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/12.4.461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  20 in total

Review 1.  Improving the detection and management of depression in primary care.

Authors:  S M Gilbody; P M Whitty; J M Grimshaw; R E Thomas
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

2.  Screening for depression in primary care. Scientific and statistical errors should have been picked up in peer review.

Authors:  William P Plummer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-03

3.  Depression screening interfaced with an electronic health record: a feasibility study in a primary care clinic using optical mark reader technology.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Klein; Jacquelyn S Hunt; Benjamin H Leblanc
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2006

4.  Conceptual models of treatment in depressed Hispanic patients.

Authors:  Alison Karasz; Liza Watkins
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 5.  Outcome measures and needs assessment tools for schizophrenia and related disorders.

Authors:  S M Gilbody; A O House; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

6.  The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  J M Valderas; A Kotzeva; M Espallargues; G Guyatt; C E Ferrans; M Y Halyard; D A Revicki; T Symonds; A Parada; J Alonso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Ethnically diverse mothers' views on the acceptability of screening for maternal depressive symptoms during pediatric well-child visits.

Authors:  Emily Feinberg; Megan V Smith; Reshma Naik
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2009-08

9.  Association between depression and abuse by partners of women attending general practice: descriptive, cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Kelsey Hegarty; Jane Gunn; Patty Chondros; Rhonda Small
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-13

Review 10.  There are no randomized controlled trials that support the United States Preventive Services Task Force Guideline on screening for depression in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brett D Thombs; Roy C Ziegelstein; Michelle Roseman; Lorie A Kloda; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.