Literature DB >> 8826065

Measuring psychological well-being. The adapted General Well-Being Index in a primary care setting: a test of validity.

J L Hopton1, S M Hunt, C Shiels, C Smith.   

Abstract

The measurement of health outcomes is central to the development of health services. Many acute and chronic illnesses and health interventions have implications for mental health. This study tests the validity of a 22 item measure of psychological well-being, the adapted general well-being index (AGWBI). A postal health survey, including the AGWBI, was sent to a 10% random sample of patients aged 16 or over drawn from the computerized list of one general practice. Two hundred and sixty-six respondents returned questionnaires (a response rate of 76%). The AGWBI was fully completed by 94% (249) of the respondents who returned their questionnaires. Only respondents who fully completed the AGWBI are included in the analysis. The AGWBI significantly discriminated people with a limiting long term illness, those reporting suffering from anxiety, depression or bad nerves, users of general practitioner services over the previous two weeks and respondents reporting taking anti-depressants, tranquillizers or sleeping tablets. It was also able to discriminate respondents with psychosocial difficulties in a small sub-sample who reported that they were in excellent health and did not have a limiting long term health problem or psychological illness. The results are broadly supportive of the validity of the AGWBI and suggest it may be appropriate for use in the evaluation of several developing areas of primary care. Further research is needed to test concurrent validity, responsiveness and to establish population norms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8826065     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/12.4.452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  7 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the general well-being index.

Authors:  Jonathan E Gaston; Laura Vogl
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Randomised controlled trial of therapeutic massage in the management of stress.

Authors:  Janet Hanley; Pamela Stirling; Christina Brown
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  More Active Mums in Stirling (MAMMiS): a physical activity intervention for postnatal women. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alyssa S Gilinsky; Adrienne R Hughes; Rhona J McInnes
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Pre-validation methods for developing a patient reported outcome instrument.

Authors:  Maria E Prior; Jemaima Che Hamzah; Jillian J Francis; Craig R Ramsay; Mayret M Castillo; Susan E Campbell; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Jennifer M Burr
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Multiple Group Membership and Well-Being: Is There Always Strength in Numbers?

Authors:  Anders L Sønderlund; Thomas A Morton; Michelle K Ryan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-21

6.  Psychometric properties of two measures of psychological well-being in adult growth hormone deficiency.

Authors:  Carolyn V McMillan; Clare Bradley; James Gibney; David L Russell-Jones; Peter H Sönksen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  The Effect of the More Active MuMs in Stirling Trial on Body Composition and Psychological Well-Being among Postnatal Women.

Authors:  Alyssa S Lee; Rhona J McInnes; Adrienne R Hughes; Wendy Guthrie; Ruth Jepson
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2016-08-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.