Literature DB >> 8826055

The usefulness of distinguishing different types of general practice consultation, or are needed skills always the same?

H R Winefield1, T G Murrell, J V Clifford, E A Farmer.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that it might be important to distinguish different types of consultation in order to understand better how help is delivered in general practice. This paper provides preliminary data on the ways that consultations can differ in how they unfold, and on how such differences might affect the helping process and the outcomes of each consultation. Several types of general practice consultation were noticed amongst 210 transcripts. Having established adequate inter-rater reliability of the classification system, we explored the differences between consultations of three broad types: Psychosocial, Complex, and Straightforward. Some of the questions asked in this preliminary study included: 1) do certain sorts of doctor, or patient, engage in certain sorts of consultation? 2) are there any relationships between the type of consultation and its length, patient-centredness or outcomes? 3) are the correlations between process and outcome clearer within categories of consultation than they are if consultations are treated as homogeneous? Findings provide a foundation for further investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8826055     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/12.4.402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  11 in total

Review 1.  The relationship between consultation length, process and outcomes in general practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Wilson; Susan Childs
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Barriers to nonpharmacologic treatments for stress, anxiety, and insomnia: family physicians' attitudes toward benzodiazepine prescribing.

Authors:  Sibyl Anthierens; Inge Pasteels; Hilde Habraken; Pascale Steinberg; Tom Declercq; Thierry Christiaens
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study.

Authors:  C A Barry; C P Bradley; N Britten; F A Stevenson; N Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

4.  Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study.

Authors:  P Little; H Everitt; I Williamson; G Warner; M Moore; C Gould; K Ferrier; S Payne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-24

Review 5.  Measuring patients' perceptions of patient-centered care: a systematic review of tools for family medicine.

Authors:  Catherine Hudon; Martin Fortin; Jeannie L Haggerty; Mireille Lambert; Marie-Eve Poitras
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Contents of general practitioner-patient consultations in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  Michael Linden; Tatjana Christof; Christiane Rentzsch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  GPs' decision-making--perceiving the patient as a person or a disease.

Authors:  Malin André; Annika Andén; Lars Borgquist; Carl Edvard Rudebeck
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Assessment of medical students' shared decision-making in standardized patient encounters.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Alicia Fernandez; Arianne Teherani; Christy K Boscardin; George W Saba
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Context factors in general practitioner-patient encounters and their impact on assessing communication skills--an exploratory study.

Authors:  Geurt Essers; Anneke Kramer; Boukje Andriesse; Chris van Weel; Cees van der Vleuten; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  The length and content of general practice consultation in two urban districts of Beijing: a preliminary observation study.

Authors:  Guanghui Jin; Yali Zhao; Chao Chen; Wenji Wang; Juan Du; Xiaoqin Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.