Literature DB >> 8825758

Dose-intensified treatment of breast cancer: current results.

C von Schilling1, F Herrmann.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy has an established role in the treatment of carcinoma of the mammary gland (breast cancer), but when administered at conventional doses the net benefit in terms of relapse prevention and overall survival duration remains limited largely to operable patients at first diagnosis with limited tumor burden (stage II disease with less than four involved axillary lymph nodes). Pilot studies evaluating significant dose escalation in patients with advanced disease have yielded high remission rates, but the impact on long-term survival remains controversial. Recent trials involving dose-intense treatment in stage IV breast cancer do not support its use except in patients who have achieved complete remission or show no evidence of disease prior to high-dose consolidation. More optimism may be warranted for the use of dose-intense chemotherapy in the high-risk adjuvant setting (stage II/IIIA) and as part of the initial treatment for patients with inflammatory breast cancer or locally advanced primary inoperable carcinoma (stage IIIB). Prospective randomized trials in all settings are ongoing, although definitive results are not expected before 1998. Apart from single-course myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy, the availability of hematopoietic growth factors through recombinant DNA technology and the easy procurement of hematopoietic cell support through mobilization of peripheral blood progenitors has spurred the development of new strategies employing dose-intense treatment within the past 10 years. Repetitive application of chemotherapy at submyeloablative doses and sequential accelerated dose-intense application of single agents are now increasingly being integrated into more complex dose-escalated protocols. This review will focus on the results of mature trials and newer approaches to dose escalation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8825758     DOI: 10.1007/bf00196355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)        ISSN: 0946-2716            Impact factor:   4.599


  73 in total

1.  The Norton-Simon hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  L Norton; R Simon
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-01

2.  High-dose consolidation therapy with autologous stem-cell rescue in stage IV breast cancer: follow-up report.

Authors:  S F Williams; T Gilewski; R Mick; J D Bitran
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Bone marrow micrometastases in chemotherapy-responsive advanced breast cancer: effect of ex vivo purging with 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide.

Authors:  J Passos-Coelho; A A Ross; J M Davis; A M Huelskamp; B Clarke; S J Noga; N E Davidson; M J Kennedy
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Age as prognostic factor in premenopausal breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A de la Rochefordiere; B Asselain; F Campana; S M Scholl; J Fenton; J R Vilcoq; J C Durand; P Pouillart; H Magdelenat; A Fourquet
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Sequential or alternating doxorubicin and CMF regimens in breast cancer with more than three positive nodes. Ten-year results.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; M Zambetti; P Valagussa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The relationship between micrometastases in the bone marrow, histopathologic features of the primary tumor in breast cancer and prognosis.

Authors:  U Berger; R Bettelheim; J L Mansi; D Easton; R C Coombes; A M Neville
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in the treatment of resectable breast cancer with more than three positive axillary nodes.

Authors:  R Buzzoni; G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; M Zambetti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Diverse prognosis in metastatic breast cancer: who should be offered alternative initial therapies?

Authors:  R Mick; C B Begg; K H Antman; A H Korzun; E Frei
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  High-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with autologous marrow support in women with measurable advanced breast cancer responding to standard-dose therapy: analysis by age.

Authors:  K Antman; L Ayash; A Elias; C Wheeler; G Schwartz; R Mazanet; I Tepler; L E Schnipper; E Frei
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1994

10.  The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to increase the intensity of treatment with doxorubicin in patients with advanced breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M H Bronchud; A Howell; D Crowther; P Hopwood; L Souza; T M Dexter
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Epirubicin: a review of its efficacy as adjuvant therapy and in the treatment of metastatic disease in breast cancer.

Authors:  D Ormrod; K Holm; K Goa; C Spencer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Epirubicin. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  A J Coukell; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.