Literature DB >> 8823833

Comparison of three cardioverter defibrillator implantation techniques: initial results with transvenous pectoral implantation.

A Anvari1, G Stix, M Grabenwöger, B Schneider, Z Türel, H Schmidinger.   

Abstract

A total of 121 patients underwent epicardial (n = 32), transvenous abdominal (n = 30), and transvenous pectoral (n = 59) ICD implants. Perioperative complications were defined as those occurring within 30 days after surgery. Hospital costs were calculated with $750 per day as a fixed charge. Duration of surgery was the time between the first skin incision and the last skin suture. Severe perioperative complications that were life-threatening or required surgical intervention occurred in the epicardial (6%) and transvenous (10%) abdominal groups, but not in the pectoral group. Perioperative mortality occurred only in the epicardial abdominal group, predominantly in patients with concomitant surgery (18%), and in 5% of patients without concomitant surgery. The duration of surgery was significantly shorter for transvenous pectoral implantation (58 +/- 15 min, P < 0.05) compared to transvenous abdominal implantation (115 +/- 38 min). Epicardial abdominal ICD implantation had the longest procedure time (154 +/- 31 min). The postimplant hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for pectoral implantation (5 +/- 3 days, P < 0.05) compared to transvenous (13 +/- 5) and epicardial (19 +/- 5) abdominal implantation. Total hospitalization costs significantly decreased in the pectoral implantation group ($4,068 +/- $2,099 for the pectoral group vs $14,887 +/- $4,415 and $9,975 +/- $3,657 for the epicardial and the transvenous abdominal group, respectively, P < 0.05). These initial results demonstrate the advantage of transvenous pectoral ICD implantation in terms of perioperative complications, procedure time, hospital length of stay, and hospitalization costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8823833     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03414.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  The Entirely Subcutaneous Defibrillator - A New Generation and Future Expectations.

Authors:  Hussam Ali; Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  Comparison of three different automatic defibrillator implantation approaches: pectoral implantation using conscious sedation reduces procedure times and cost.

Authors:  A Bollmann; N K Kanuru; D DeLurgio; P F Walter; J C Burnette; J J Langberg
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Athletes with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.

Authors:  Shiva P Ponamgi; Christopher V DeSimone; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.182

4.  Pulmonary embolism in patients with transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device leads.

Authors:  Amit Noheria; Shiva P Ponamgi; Christopher V Desimone; Vaibhav R Vaidya; Christopher A Aakre; Elisa Ebrille; Tiffany Hu; David O Hodge; Joshua P Slusser; Naser M Ammash; Charles J Bruce; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Intravenous sedation for cardiac procedures can be administered safely and cost-effectively by non-anesthesia personnel.

Authors:  Anna Kezerashvili; John D Fisher; Jessica DeLaney; Savi Mushiyev; Eileen Monahan; Vanessa Taylor; Soo G Kim; Kevin J Ferrick; Jay N Gross; Eugen C Palma; Andrew K Krumerman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 1.900

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.