BACKGROUND: The superior-septal approach provides an excellent view of the mitral valve and therefore has received considerable interest. However, the safety of this approach is controversial because it requires division of the sinus node artery in most cases. METHODS: Postoperative cardiac rhythms were analyzed in 152 consecutive patients who underwent mitral valve procedures between January 1992 and February 1995 with a conventional right lateral left atriotomy (group 1, n = 69) or the superior-septal approach (group 2, n = 83). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 38 months, and the mean follow-up was 16.1 months in group 1 and 13.8 months in group 2. RESULTS: The mortality rate was similar in the two groups (1.4% in group 1 and 1.2% in group 2), and the causes of death were not related to the left atriotomy. At discharge, 96% of the patients in group 1 who were in sinus rhythm preoperatively and 78% of those in group 2 remained in sinus rhythm. At the last follow-up, 88% of these patients in group 1 and 83% in group 2 remained in sinus rhythm. Among the patients in atrial fibrillation or junctional rhythm before operation, 12% in group 1 and 11% in group 2 had regained sinus rhythm at the last follow-up. There were no significant differences in these values. CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of dysrhythmias was higher with the superior-septal approach in the early postoperative period, this approach provides an excellent operative view of the mitral valve and similar results in terms of late postoperative cardiac rhythms as the right lateral left atriotomy.
BACKGROUND: The superior-septal approach provides an excellent view of the mitral valve and therefore has received considerable interest. However, the safety of this approach is controversial because it requires division of the sinus node artery in most cases. METHODS:Postoperative cardiac rhythms were analyzed in 152 consecutive patients who underwent mitral valve procedures between January 1992 and February 1995 with a conventional right lateral left atriotomy (group 1, n = 69) or the superior-septal approach (group 2, n = 83). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 38 months, and the mean follow-up was 16.1 months in group 1 and 13.8 months in group 2. RESULTS: The mortality rate was similar in the two groups (1.4% in group 1 and 1.2% in group 2), and the causes of death were not related to the left atriotomy. At discharge, 96% of the patients in group 1 who were in sinus rhythm preoperatively and 78% of those in group 2 remained in sinus rhythm. At the last follow-up, 88% of these patients in group 1 and 83% in group 2 remained in sinus rhythm. Among the patients in atrial fibrillation or junctional rhythm before operation, 12% in group 1 and 11% in group 2 had regained sinus rhythm at the last follow-up. There were no significant differences in these values. CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of dysrhythmias was higher with the superior-septal approach in the early postoperative period, this approach provides an excellent operative view of the mitral valve and similar results in terms of late postoperative cardiac rhythms as the right lateral left atriotomy.