Literature DB >> 8822988

Clinically silent electrocardiographic abnormalities and risk of primary cardiac arrest among hypertensive patients.

D S Siscovick1, T E Raghunathan, P Rautaharju, B M Psaty, L A Cobb, E H Wagner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether continuous ECG indexes that reflect the severity of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVHI), myocardial injury (CIIS), and QT-interval prolongation (QTI) are associated with the risk of primary cardiac arrest among hypertensive patients, independent of conventional binary ECG criteria, remains unknown. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We conducted a population-based case-control study among patients who were free of clinically recognized heart disease and who received care at a health maintenance organization. Cases (n = 131) were treated hypertensive patients who had had a primary cardiac arrest between 1977 and 1990. Controls (n = 562) were a stratified random sample of treated hypertensive patients. Resting ECGs were reviewed to estimate the severity of left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial injury, and QT-interval prolongation on the basis of the algorithms of the Novacode ECG classification system. After adjustment for other risk factors and binary ECG criteria for the abnormalities, the LVHI, CIIS, and QTI scores were directly related to the risk of primary cardiac arrest. In a comparison of the 80th with the 20th percentile score for the LVHI, the risk was increased 40% (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.0); for the CIIS, the risk was increased 70% (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.5); and for the QTI, the risk was increased 80% (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that continuous ECG indexes that reflect left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial injury, and QT-interval prolongation are directly related to the risk of primary cardiac arrest among hypertensive patients without clinically recognized heart disease. Binary ECG criteria may underestimate the prognostic importance of these pathophysiological abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8822988     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.94.6.1329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of genetic and non-genetic factors that affect the QTc interval in a Mongolian population: the GENDISCAN study.

Authors:  Sun-Wha Im; Mi Kyeong Lee; Hee Jeong Lee; Se-Il Oh; Hyung-Lae Kim; Joohon Sung; Sung-Il Cho; Jeong-Sun Seo; Jong-Il Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 8.718

Review 2.  Modulation of the QT interval duration in hypertension with antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  Jan Klimas; Peter Kruzliak; Simon W Rabkin
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Subclinical myocardial injury identified by cardiac infarction/injury score and the risk of mortality in men and women free of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Wesley T O'Neal; Amit J Shah; Jimmy T Efird; Pentti M Rautaharju; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  The genetics of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Dan E Arking; Nona Sotoodehnia
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 8.929

5.  Drug-sensitized zebrafish screen identifies multiple genes, including GINS3, as regulators of myocardial repolarization.

Authors:  David J Milan; Albert M Kim; Jeffrey R Winterfield; Ian L Jones; Arne Pfeufer; Serena Sanna; Dan E Arking; Adam H Amsterdam; Khaled M Sabeh; John D Mably; David S Rosenbaum; Randall T Peterson; Aravinda Chakravarti; Stefan Kääb; Dan M Roden; Calum A MacRae
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Coronary Artery Disease and Atherosclerotic Risk Factors in a Population-Based Study of Sudden Death.

Authors:  Golsa Joodi; Joan A Maradey; Brittany Bogle; Mojtaba Mirzaei; Murrium I Sadaf; Irion Pursell; Cory Henderson; John Paul Mounsey; Ross J Simpson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Acute adverse effects of fine particulate air pollution on ventricular repolarization.

Authors:  Duanping Liao; Michele L Shaffer; Sol Rodriguez-Colon; Fan He; Xian Li; Deborah L Wolbrette; Jeff Yanosky; Wayne E Cascio
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Risk factors for sudden cardiac death to determine high risk patients in specific patient populations that may benefit from a wearable defibrillator.

Authors:  Hilal Mohammed Khan; Stephen J Leslie
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-26

9.  The impact of multiple sclerosis onset symptom on cardiac repolarization.

Authors:  Alma Mikkola; Aku Ojanen; Juha E K Hartikainen; Anne M Remes; Sakari Simula
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Subclinical myocardial injury and cardiovascular mortality: Racial differences in prevalence and risk (from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination survey).

Authors:  Stephen T Broughton; Muhammad Ahmad; Elsayed Z Soliman; Jared W Magnani
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 1.468

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.