Literature DB >> 8821848

Incidence and significance of chromosome mosaicism involving an autosomal structural abnormality diagnosed prenatally through amniocentesis: a collaborative study.

L Y Hsu1, M T Yu, K E Richkind, D L Van Dyke, B F Crandall, D F Saxe, G S Khodr, M Mennuti, G Stetten, W A Miller, J H Priest.   

Abstract

Among 179,663 prenatal diagnosis cases collected from ten institutions and two publications, 555 (0.3 per cent) were diagnosed as having chromosome mosaicism. Of these, 57 (10.3 per cent) were mosaic for an autosomal structural abnormality, 28 (5 per cent) for a sex chromosome structural abnormality, and 85 (15.3 per cent) were mosaic for a marker chromosome. Ninety-five cases of prenatally diagnosed mosaicism with a structural abnormality in an autosome and a normal cell line, and with a known phenotypic outcome, were collected for karyotype-phenotype correlations through our collaboration (40 cases), a prior survey (26 cases), and published reports (29 cases). They included 13 balanced reciprocal translocations, one unbalanced reciprocal translocation, four balanced Robertsonian translocations, four unbalanced Robertsonian translocations, four inversions, 17 deletions, three ring chromosomes, 19 i(20q), seven +i(12p), six other isochromosomes, and 17 partial trisomies resulting from a duplication or other rearrangement. All cases mosaic for a balanced structural rearrangement resulted in a normal phenotype. All cases of 46/46,i(20q) resulted in normal liveborns. Five of seven cases with 46/47,+i(12p) had an abnormal phenotype compatible with Killian-Pallister syndrome. The overall risk for an abnormal outcome for a mosaic case with an unbalanced structural abnormality, excluding 46/46,i(20q) and 46/47,+i(12p), is 40.4 per cent. In the same category, the study also suggested a correlation between the percentage of abnormal cells and an abnormal phenotype. For mosaicism involving a terminal deletion, the possibility of a familial fragile site should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8821848     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199601)16:1<1::AID-PD816>3.0.CO;2-W

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  16 in total

1.  Multiple constitutional chromosome translocations of familial nature in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia: a report on a unique case.

Authors:  Béla Kajtár; Linda Deák; Veronika Kalász; László Pajor; Lenke Molnár; Gábor Méhes
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  A genomic view of mosaicism and human disease.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Mosaic uniparental disomies and aneuploidies as large structural variants of the human genome.

Authors:  Benjamín Rodríguez-Santiago; Núria Malats; Nathaniel Rothman; Lluís Armengol; Montse Garcia-Closas; Manolis Kogevinas; Olaya Villa; Amy Hutchinson; Julie Earl; Gaëlle Marenne; Kevin Jacobs; Daniel Rico; Adonina Tardón; Alfredo Carrato; Gilles Thomas; Alfonso Valencia; Debra Silverman; Francisco X Real; Stephen J Chanock; Luis A Pérez-Jurado
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for rapid distinction between unique sequence positive and negative marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Petra Noomen; Malgorzata Srebniak; Guus Hamers; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Mosaicism in Over 18,000 Pregnancies: A Five-Year Single-Tertiary-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Shuyuan Li; Yiru Shi; Xu Han; Yiyao Chen; Yinghua Shen; Wenjing Hu; Xinrong Zhao; Yanlin Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Somatic genomic variations in early human prenatal development.

Authors:  Caroline Robberecht; Evelyne Vanneste; Anne Pexsters; Thomas D'Hooghe; Thierry Voet; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.236

7.  Meiotic errors followed by two parallel postzygotic trisomy rescue events are a frequent cause of constitutional segmental mosaicism.

Authors:  Caroline Robberecht; Thierry Voet; Gülen E Utine; Albert Schinzel; Nicole de Leeuw; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Joris Vermeesch
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Somatic mosaicism detected by exon-targeted, high-resolution aCGH in 10,362 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Justin Pham; Chad Shaw; Amber Pursley; Patricia Hixson; Srirangan Sampath; Erin Roney; Tomasz Gambin; Sung-Hae L Kang; Weimin Bi; Seema Lalani; Carlos Bacino; James R Lupski; Pawel Stankiewicz; Ankita Patel; Sau-Wai Cheung
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 9.  Chromosomal Mosaicism in Human Feto-Placental Development: Implications for Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Francesca Romana Grati
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Somatic/gonadal mosaicism for structural autosomal rearrangements: female predominance among carriers of gonadal mosaicism for unbalanced rearrangements.

Authors:  Natalia V Kovaleva; Philip D Cotter
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.