Literature DB >> 8821364

Prevalence of self-reported respiratory disease symptoms among veterinarians in the Southern Netherlands.

M J Tielen1, A R Elbers, M Snijdelaar, P J van Gulick, L Preller, P J Blaauw.   

Abstract

In June 1991, 831 veterinarians registered in the Southern Netherlands were mailed a questionnaire to obtain details of work practice and health problems. One hundred fifty-two veterinarians were not eligible (retired or not working regularly), 497 practitioners returned a complete questionnaire (73% response rate). The purpose was to assess the prevalence of respiratory disease symptoms (RDS) and to compare the prevalence of RDS between occupational specialties and with a group of swine farmers. The professional specialty of each veterinarian was grouped as: small-animal practice (17%), large-animal practice (51%), mixed-animal practice (14%), and other practice (i.e., government, industry) (18%). Adjusted for age, gender, smoking, history of atopy, and use of respiratory protective devices, large-animal practitioners had a two times higher odds of chronic cough (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.8) or chronic phlegm production (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.7) and a three times higher odds of chest wheezing (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-6.3) than veterinarians with another specialty. Modelling the occurrence of RDS in veterinarians with exposure variables indicated that working more than 20 hr per week in swine confinement buildings increased the odds of occurrence of chronic cough and chronic phlegm production approximately three times, in addition to a significant effect of smoking. Besides a significant effect of smoking and history of atopy, no exposure variables other than occupation were associated with occurrence of asthmatic attacks in swine farmers and large-animal practitioners. Large-animal practitioners had a two times higher odds of asthmatic attacks (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.9) than swine farmers. Large-animal practitioners have a considerably higher proportion of symptoms like cough, phlegm production, a stuffed up nose, sneezing, and tearing eyes than small-animal practitioners during, and 4-8 hr after, working with animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8821364     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199602)29:2<201::AID-AJIM11>3.0.CO;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  5 in total

1.  Animal production and wheeze in the Agricultural Health Study: interactions with atopy, asthma, and smoking.

Authors:  J A Hoppin; D M Umbach; S J London; M C R Alavanja; D P Sandler
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Respiratory allergies among veterinarians: two cross-sectional surveys from 2006 to 2012.

Authors:  M Schelkle; J Braun; R Jörres; R Schierl; Holger Dressel
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Occupational health hazards in veterinary medicine: zoonoses and other biological hazards.

Authors:  Tasha Epp; Cheryl Waldner
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.008

4.  Chronic cough due to occupational factors.

Authors:  David A Groneberg; Dennis Nowak; Anke Wussow; Axel Fischer
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 2.646

5.  Upper and lower respiratory airway complaints among female veterinary staff.

Authors:  F Hoffmeyer; A Beine; A Lotz; O Kleinmüller; C Nöllenheidt; E Zahradnik; A Nienhaus; M Raulf
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 3.015

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.