Literature DB >> 8820847

Indications for dual-chamber (DDD) pacing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients.

M Santini1, G Ansalone, A Auriti, B Magris, C Pandozi, G Altamura.   

Abstract

New technologic development of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) keeps up with the exponential increase of their use for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The first-generation ICD with limited shock capability alone could be considered adequate in most cardiac arrest victims, but it was not suitable for sudden death prevention in all high-risk patients with cardiac disease. The second-generation ICD was comprised of hybrid pacemaker-defibrillator systems that provided on-demand ventricular antibradycardia pacing. The third-generation devices include additional functions, such as antitachycardia pacing for ventricular tachycardia (VT) reversion and low-energy ventricular cardioversion, in addition to ventricular defibrillation and single-chamber ventricular demand pacing. In the near future, advanced dual-chamber atrioventricular (AV) pacing and defibrillating systems will also be available. The dual chamber ICD will allow atrial inhibited/dual-chamber (AAI/DDD) rate-responsive pacing, simultaneous atrial and ventricular sensing to optimize the arrhythmia identification, and ICD shock delivery in the proper arrhythmia-related chamber. Clinical benefits of these devices compared with their cost and complexity will require careful evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8820847     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00513-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Implantable dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator-pacemaker.

Authors:  D Pfeiffer; M Mende; A Hagendorff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Differences in outcomes between patients treated with single- versus dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a substudy of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II.

Authors:  Loren D Berenbom; Brian C Weiford; James L Vacek; Martin P Emert; W Jackson Hall; Mark L Andrews; Scott McNitt; Wojciech Zareba; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Prevalence of sensing abnormalities in dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Mohammad Saeed; Anna Jin; Gregory Pontone; Steve Higgins; Michael Gold; David Harari; Steven Nunley; Mark S Link; Munther K Homoud; N A Mark Estes; Paul J Wang
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Single-chamber versus dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators: do we need physiologic pacing in the course?

Authors:  Marco Budeus; Thomas Buck; Heinrich Wieneke; Raimund Erbel; Stefan Sack
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2006-07-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.