Literature DB >> 8820801

Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair.

K A Kupiec1, K M Wuertz, W W Barkmeier, T M Wilwerding.   

Abstract

Intraoral repairs often involve bonding composite to fractured porcelain. Newer adhesive systems, currently referred to as multipurpose systems, include materials with recommended procedures for repair of porcelain. This laboratory study evaluated various treatment regimens with the ProBond adhesive system. Three different porcelain surface procedures were used: (1) air abrasion with aluminum oxide (50 microm), (2) 8% hydrofluoric acid, and (3) air abrasion and hydrofluoric acid. Eight different treatment procedures were then used to bond 10 composite cylinders to porcelain surfaces in each group. Shear bond strengths (in megapascals) were determined with an Instron testing machine after storage in water for 24 hours at 37 degrees C and after 3 months of storage and thermocycling. The combination of air abrasion and hydrofluoric acid on porcelain surfaces before bonding composite recorded the most consistently effective bond strengths. Four of the treatment regimens in the air abrasion groups yielded low bond strengths at 3 months. This study also indicated that silane treatment of porcelain is critical for development of suitable bond strengths for composite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8820801     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90294-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  14 in total

1.  Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems.

Authors:  Tevfik Yavuz; Erhan Dilber; Haluk Baris Kara; Ali Riza Tuncdemir; A Nilgun Ozturk
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Apparent interfacial fracture toughness of resin/ceramic systems.

Authors:  A Della Bona; K J Anusavice; J J Mecholsky
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Shear bond, wettability and AFM evaluations on CO2 laser-irradiated CAD/CAM ceramic surfaces.

Authors:  Ahmed El Gamal; Etienne Medioni; Jean Paul Rocca; Carlo Fornaini; Omid H Muhammad; Nathalie Brulat-Bouchard
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of porcelain and composite using different bonding agents - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Roseline Meshramkar; Suresh Sajjan
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2010-08-05

5.  CO2 laser conditioning of porcelain surfaces for bonding metal orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Farzin Heravi; Mohsen Hosseini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Effect of surface treatment with laser on repair bond strength of composite resin to ceramic.

Authors:  Nazanin Kiomarsi; Azin Jarrah; Nasim Chiniforoush; Sedighe Sadat Hashemikamangar; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-03-21

7.  Intraoral repair of all ceramic fixed partial denture utilizing preimpregnated fiber reinforced composite.

Authors:  Süha Turkaslan; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-01

8.  Ceramic restoration repair: report of two cases.

Authors:  Luís Henrique Araújo Raposo; Natália Antunes Neiva; Gisele Rodrigues da Silva; Hugo Lemes Carlo; Adérito Soares da Mota; Célio Jesus do Prado; Carlos José Soares
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  The effect of remin pro and MI paste plus on bleached enamel surface roughness.

Authors:  Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad Akhoundi; Farzaneh Aghajani; Javad Chalipa; Amir Hooman Sadrhaghighi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-03-31

10.  Addition of a pontic to all-ceramic Turkom-Cera fixed partial denture restorations.

Authors:  Bulent Uludag; Emre Tokar; Serdar Polat
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.