Literature DB >> 8820092

MR arthrography: is it worthwhile?

W E Palmer1.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography is possible in any joint in which standard arthrography is performed. The diagnostic potential of this technique is optimized in the assessment of complex anatomical structures and intra-articular abnormalities that are difficult to visualize on conventional MR images. This paper presents the most common applications of MR arthrography in the shoulder, hip, knee, ankle, elbow and wrist, and explores the clinical indications in which MR arthrography adds the greatest benefit compared to standard arthrography and conventional MR imaging. Arthrographic MR images are most valuable in the evaluation of glenoid and acetabular labra, tendons of the rotator cuff, post-operative menisci, osteochondral fractures and loose bodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8820092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  4 in total

Review 1.  Direct magnetic resonance arthrography.

Authors:  Dmitry Elentuck; William E Palmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison of low-field (0.2 T) vs high-field (1.5 T) imaging.

Authors:  R Loew; K F Kreitner; M Runkel; J Zoellner; M Thelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  The distribution in joint recesses and adjacent synovial compartments of loose bodies determined on MR and CT arthrographies of ankle joint.

Authors:  Hayri Ogul; Bahar Cankaya; Mecit Kantarci
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  The posterior transtriceps approach for intra-articular elbow diagnostics, definitely not forgotten.

Authors:  Jan-Maarten van Wagenberg; Jeroen L Turkenburg; Frank T G Rahusen; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.