Literature DB >> 8819386

Acute pulmonary embolism: value of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in comparison with helical CT.

P Steiner1, G K Lund, J F Debatin, D Steiner, C Nienaber, V Nicolas, E Bücheler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to prospectively compare the accuracy of transthoracic and transesophageal B-mode and Doppler echocardiography with helical CT for detecting acute pulmonary embolism. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients underwent transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and contrast-enhanced helical CT. Echocardiographic examinations were analyzed for indirect criteria, including increased main pulmonary artery diameter, tricuspid regurgitation, and dilatation of the right ventricular cavity, as well as for direct thrombus visualization. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated.
RESULTS: Pulmonary embolism was revealed by helical CT in 22 of 35 patients; in 11 of these 22 cases, central pulmonary embolism was seen. Transthoracic and transesophageal B-mode echocardiography failed to reveal pulmonary embolism in nine patients, two of whom had central pulmonary embolism. The sensitivity and specificity of the combination of both echocardiographic investigations were 59% and 77% respectively (82% and 92% for central pulmonary embolism). In three patients, pulmonary embolism was diagnosed by direct clot detection with transesophageal echocardiography. In two patients, only the indirect parameters indicated pulmonary embolism. Overall indirect echocardiographic parameters were characterized by a low sensitivity that ranged from 50% for tricuspid regurgitation to 21% for main pulmonary artery diameter.
CONCLUSION: In comparison with helical CT, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography had limited accuracy for detecting pulmonary embolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8819386     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.167.4.8819386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  An unusual clinical presentation resembling superior vena cava syndrome post heart surgery.

Authors:  Angel López-Candales; David Kaczorowski; Ronald Pellegrini
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 2.062

2.  Severity assessment of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation using helical CT.

Authors:  D Collomb; P J Paramelle; O Calaque; J L Bosson; G Vanzetto; D Barnoud; C Pison; M Coulomb; G Ferretti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the coronary care unit.

Authors:  Paul D Stein; H Dirk Sostman; Russell D Hull; Lawrence R Goodman; Kenneth V Leeper; Alexander Gottschalk; Victor F Tapson; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  [Diagnostic assessment of perioperative thromboembolism].

Authors:  Thomas Lang
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009-10

6.  Echocardiography practice, training and accreditation in the intensive care: document for the World Interactive Network Focused on Critical Ultrasound (WINFOCUS).

Authors:  Susanna Price; Gabriele Via; Erik Sloth; Fabio Guarracino; Raoul Breitkreutz; Emanuele Catena; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 2.062

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.