Literature DB >> 8819380

Fetal anatomy revealed with fast MR sequences.

D Levine1, H Hatabu, J Gaa, M W Atkinson, R R Edelman.   

Abstract

Although all the imaging studies in this pictorial essay were done for maternal rather than fetal indications, fetal anatomy was well visualized. However, when scans are undertaken for fetal indications, fetal motion in between scout views and imaging sequences may make specific image planes difficult to obtain. Of the different techniques described in this review, we preferred the HASTE technique and use it almost exclusively for scanning pregnant patients. The T2-weighting is ideal for delineating fetal organs. Also, the HASTE technique allows images to be obtained in 430 msec, limiting artifacts arising from maternal and fetal motion. MR imaging should play a more important role in evaluating equivocal sonographic cases as fast scanning techniques are more widely used. Obstetric MR imaging no longer will be limited by fetal motion artifacts. When complex anatomy requires definition in a complicated pregnant patient, MR imaging should be considered as a useful adjunct to sonography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8819380     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.167.4.8819380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  19 in total

1.  Bias field inconsistency correction of motion-scattered multislice MRI for improved 3D image reconstruction.

Authors:  Kio Kim; Piotr A Habas; Vidya Rajagopalan; Julia A Scott; James M Corbett-Detig; Francois Rousseau; A James Barkovich; Orit A Glenn; Colin Studholme
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Screening of fetal CNS anomalies by MR imaging.

Authors:  Wan-Yuo Guo; Tai-Tong Wong
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Antenatal determination of fetal brain activity in response to an acoustic stimulus using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R J Moore; S Vadeyar; J Fulford; D J Tyler; C Gribben; P N Baker; D James; P A Gowland
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  [Indications for fetal magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  D Prayer; P C Brugger; E Krampl; L Prayer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Liver, meconium, haemorrhage: the value of T1-weighted images in fetal MRI.

Authors:  Jan Zizka; Pavel Elias; Karel Hodik; Jaroslav Tintera; Vera Juttnerova; Zdenek Belobradek; Ludovit Klzo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-06-24

Review 6.  Motion-compensation techniques in neonatal and fetal MR imaging.

Authors:  C Malamateniou; S J Malik; S J Counsell; J M Allsop; A K McGuinness; T Hayat; K Broadhouse; R G Nunes; A M Ederies; J V Hajnal; M A Rutherford
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  T2-weighted balanced steady-state free procession MRI evaluated for diagnosing placental adhesion disorder in late pregnancy.

Authors:  Ang Yang; Xue Hong Xiao; Zhi Long Wang; Ze Yan Wang; Ke Yi Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: brain normal linear biometric values below 24 gestational weeks.

Authors:  C Parazzini; A Righini; M Rustico; D Consonni; F Triulzi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography in fetal pathology.

Authors:  A Perrone; S Savelli; C Maggi; L Di Pietro; M Di Maurizio; J Tesei; L Ballesio; C De Felice; A Giancotti; R Di Iorio; L Manganaro
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Pictorial essay: MRI of the fetal brain.

Authors:  Ganesh Rao B; Bs Ramamurthy
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2009-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.