Literature DB >> 8818250

Detection of the binaural interaction component in the auditory brainstem response.

M H Stollman1, A F Snik, G C Hombergen, R Nieuwenhuys, P ten Koppel.   

Abstract

In humans, the binaural interaction at the brainstem level has been studied for over 15 years. The binaural interaction component (BIC) is obtained by subtracting the summed auditory brainstem response (ABR) in the monaural stimulus mode from the ABR obtained in the binaural stimulus mode. By nature of this subtraction process, the signal-to-noise ratio of the difference waveform is poor, requiring an objective detection criterion to decide whether a significant BIC is present. In this study, the effectiveness of two analysis methods was compared. The first method is the "3 SD' method, which is based on a signal-to-noise evaluation. The second method is a template matching method, in which templates are derived from normal hearing subjects' responses and individual responses are cross-correlated with these templates. The templates were allowed to shift over a range of -0.8 to 0.8 ms in search of the maximum correlation coefficient. Thirty-nine subjects with normal hearing and five patients with a unilateral profound hearing loss participated in the study. ABRs were obtained with rarefaction and condensation clicks at a rate of 15/s and a level of 70 dB nHL. Latencies of the ABR waves I, III and V for all normal hearing subjects and for the normal ear of the patients were within the normal range. The efficiencies of both methods, defined as the number of normal hearing adults with a significant BIC plus the number of patients without a significant BIC divided by the total number of subjects, were determined. The results show that the "3 SD' method is superior to the template matching method: the efficiencies were 95% and 70% respectively, when responses to rarefaction and condensation clicks were taken together. With the "3 SD' method, a significant BIC is demonstrated in almost all normal hearing subjects (97%). However, the "3 SD' method also falsely indicated a significant BIC in one patient. These results suggest that the BIC may have clinical value in studying binaural interaction in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8818250     DOI: 10.3109/03005369609079043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  6 in total

Review 1.  [The binaural interaction component: a clinically useful diagnostic instrument?].

Authors:  W Delb
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Geneviève Laumen; Alexander T Ferber; Georg M Klump; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Test-Retest Reliability of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Alexander T Ferber; Victor Benichoux; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  A Comparison of Two Objective Measures of Binaural Processing: The Interaural Phase Modulation Following Response and the Binaural Interaction Component.

Authors:  Nicholas R Haywood; Jaime A Undurraga; Torsten Marquardt; David McAlpine
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.

Authors:  Carol A Sammeth; Nathaniel T Greene; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  The effect of interaural timing on the posterior auricular muscle reflex in normal adult volunteers.

Authors:  T P Doubell; A Alsetrawi; D A S Bastawrous; M A S Bastawrous; A Daibes; A Jadalla; J W H Schnupp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.