Literature DB >> 8817452

Cytological analysis of fertilization and early embryonic development in incompatible crosses of Drosophila simulans.

C W Lassy1, T L Karr.   

Abstract

Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is a unique form of male sterility found in numerous insect species that harbor a bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia. CI is characterized by severe reduction in the progeny produced when infected males are crossed to uninfected females. The reduction in progeny correlates with developmental defects that arise during and immediately following fertilization, suggesting that sperm function is disrupted. To investigate the nature of the cellular defects associated with CI, fertilization and early embryonic development were examined in normal and incompatible crosses of Drosophila simulans using anti-sperm, anti-tubulin and anti-chromatin antibodies. Although pleiotropic, defects associated with CI can be classified into five broad categories: (1) sperm defects in the egg; (2) aberrant morphology of the mitotic apparatus; (3) defects in chromatin structure; (4) proliferation of centrosomes in the absence of nuclear division; and (5) loss of mitotic synchrony. Although mitosis and chromosome behavior are severely disrupted in CI crosses during early development, centrosome duplication and migration appear to continue unabated. The available cytological data suggest that the primary defects observed in incompatible crosses are due to defects in chromosome replication/segregation and in associated centrosome/microtubule-based processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8817452     DOI: 10.1016/0925-4773(96)00527-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mech Dev        ISSN: 0925-4773            Impact factor:   1.882


  38 in total

1.  A genetic test of the mechanism of Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila.

Authors:  D C Presgraves
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Exploring the evolution of Wolbachia compatibility types: a simulation approach.

Authors:  Sylvain Charlat; Claire Calmet; Olivier Andrieu; Hervé Merçot
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Widespread prevalence of wolbachia in laboratory stocks and the implications for Drosophila research.

Authors:  Michael E Clark; Cort L Anderson; Jessica Cande; Timothy L Karr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A genetic test of the role of the maternal pronucleus in Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Patrick M Ferree; William Sullivan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Wolbachia density and virulence attenuation after transfer into a novel host.

Authors:  E A McGraw; D J Merritt; J N Droller; S L O'Neill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cytological analysis of cytoplasmic incompatibility induced by Cardinium suggests convergent evolution with its distant cousin Wolbachia.

Authors:  Marco Gebiola; Massimo Giorgini; Suzanne E Kelly; Matthew R Doremus; Patrick M Ferree; Martha S Hunter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Characterization of Wolbachia transfection efficiency by using microinjection of embryonic cytoplasm and embryo homogenate.

Authors:  Zhiyong Xi; Stephen L Dobson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Offsetting effects of Wolbachia infection and heat shock on sperm production in Drosophila simulans: analyses of fecundity, fertility and accessory gland proteins.

Authors:  R R Snook; S Y Cleland; M F Wolfner; T L Karr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Induced paternal effects mimic cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael E Clark; Benjamin D Heath; Cort L Anderson; Timothy L Karr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Natural Wolbachia infections in the Drosophila yakuba species complex do not induce cytoplasmic incompatibility but fully rescue the wRi modification.

Authors:  Sofia Zabalou; Sylvain Charlat; Androniki Nirgianaki; Daniel Lachaise; Hervé Merçot; Kostas Bourtzis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.