Literature DB >> 8817257

Selection of motor responses on the basis of unperceived stimuli.

J L Taylor1, D I McCloskey.   

Abstract

In a previous study, the sensory phenomenon of "backward masking" was used to demonstrate that subjects can preprogram a single stereotyped voluntary movement or movement-sequence and that such a movement can be triggered in response to a stimulus that is not perceived (that is, a stimulus of which the subject is unaware). In the present study, visual stimuli were presented at random in one of two different locations to normal human subjects in a choice reaction-time (RT) task. When the stimulus appeared in one of the locations, subjects made a motor response. When the stimulus appeared in the other location, subjects made a different motor response. Large and small stimuli were presented in either location. In some trials, the small stimulus was followed 50 ms later by the large stimulus. The small stimulus was then "masked" by the large stimulus and could not be perceived on forced-choice testing. Despite not perceiving the test stimulus in either of its randomly selected locations, subjects were able to select and execute the motor response appropriate for each location. The RTs for responses to the masked stimulus and to the same stimulus presented without masking (and so, easily perceived) were the same. This result implies that appropriate programs for two separate movements can be simultaneously held ready for use, and that either one can be executed when triggered by specific stimuli without subjective awareness of such stimuli and so without further voluntary elaboration in response to such awareness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8817257     DOI: 10.1007/bf00241375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Backward masking.

Authors:  D H RAAB
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast.

Authors:  E FEHRER; D RAAB
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-02

3.  A comparison of reaction time and verbal report in the detection of masked stimuli.

Authors:  E FEHRER; I BIEDERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-08

4.  Motor programming is not the only process which can influence RT: some thoughts on the Marteniuk and MacKenzie analysis.

Authors:  S T Klapp
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Response programming and reaction time.

Authors:  M R Sheridan
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

Review 7.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Triggering of preprogrammed movements as reactions to masked stimuli.

Authors:  J L Taylor; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Delay in the execution of voluntary movement by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in intact man. Evidence for the storage of motor programs in the brain.

Authors:  B L Day; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; A Maertens de Noordhout; K Nakashima; K Shannon; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12
View more
  9 in total

1.  Motor adaptation to a small force field superimposed on a large background force.

Authors:  Jiayin Liu; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visuomotor system uses target features unavailable to conscious awareness.

Authors:  Gordon Binsted; Kyle Brownell; Zofia Vorontsova; Matthew Heath; Deborah Saucier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Volitional control of movement: the physiology of free will.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Neural correlates of the essence of conscious conflict: fMRI of sustaining incompatible intentions.

Authors:  Jeremy R Gray; John A Bargh; Ezequiel Morsella
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The inevitable contrast: Conscious vs. unconscious processes in action control.

Authors:  Ezequiel Morsella; T Andrew Poehlman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-10

6.  A dynamic noise background reveals perceptual motion extrapolation: The twinkle-goes illusion.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Adaptive skeletal muscle action requires anticipation and "conscious broadcasting".

Authors:  T Andrew Poehlman; Tiffany K Jantz; Ezequiel Morsella
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-28

8.  Subconscious visual cues during movement execution allow correct online choice reactions.

Authors:  Christian Leukel; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen; Mark Schram Christensen; Albert Gollhofer; Jens Bo Nielsen; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Action evaluation is modulated dominantly by internal sensorimotor information and partly by noncausal external cue.

Authors:  Takao Fukui; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.