Literature DB >> 8816183

Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring of critical patients in the emergency department.

W C Shoemaker1, C C Wo, M H Bishop, D Thangathurai, R S Patil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of multicomponent noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in critical emergency patients and to compare this technique with simultaneous invasive monitoring by the pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was done comparing invasive monitoring and noninvasive monitoring in 60 critically ill or injured patients who required hemodynamic monitoring shortly after entering the ED of a university-affiliated country hospital. Cardiac output (CO) values measured by the standard thermo-dilution pulmonary artery catheter technique were compared with simultaneously obtained measurements using a noninvasive bioimpedance method. Concurrent measurements were made of pulse oximetry to screen pulmonary function and transcutaneous oximetry to assess tissue perfusion.
RESULTS: The impedance CO values closely approximated those for the thermodilution method; r 0.81, p < 0.001. Significant circulatory abnormalities, including hypotension, reduced cardiac index, arterial hemoglobin desaturation, tissue hypoxia, reduced O2 delivery, and consumption, were found in 54 of the 60 (90%) patients. The cardiac index decreased in 44% of the patients, the transcutaneous O2 decreased in 39%, and the O2 saturation by pulse oximetry fell in 22% during the observation period in the ED (commonly lasting 2-8 hours).
CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive monitoring can provide hemodynamic and perfusion information previously available only by invasive thermodilution catheters. Such noninvasive monitoring can display continuous on-line real-time data, allowing immediate recognition of circulatory abnormalities and providing a means to titrate therapy to appropriate therapeutic goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8816183     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03489.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  6 in total

1.  Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  G Galizia; G Prizio; E Lieto; P Castellano; L Pelosio; V Imperatore; A Ferrara; C Pignatelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion.

Authors:  Alexandre Lima; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The efficacy and value of emergency medicine: a supportive literature review.

Authors:  C James Holliman; Terrence M Mulligan; Robert E Suter; Peter Cameron; Lee Wallis; Philip D Anderson; Kathleen Clem
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-22

Review 4.  Clinical review: New technologies -- venturing out of the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Ronny Otero; A Joseph Garcia
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  End expiratory oxygen concentrations to predict central venous oxygen saturation: an observational pilot study.

Authors:  Alan E Jones; Karl Kuehne; Michael Steuerwald; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2006-09-20

Review 6.  Nontraumatic hypotension and shock in the emergency department and the prehospital setting, prevalence, etiology, and mortality: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jon Gitz Holler; Camilla Nørgaard Bech; Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen; Søren Mikkelsen; Court Pedersen; Annmarie Touborg Lassen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.