AIM: To describe the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of enterococcal clinical isolates. SETTING: A 200-bed tertiary-care center in Mexico City. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective surveillance of enterococcal clinical isolates identified according to Facklam's method since 1990. Susceptibility tests were performed by a commercial micromethod, agar diffusion and microbroth dilution. We present data from 1990 to 1992. RESULTS: A total of 407 enterococci were recovered during the study period: 245 from inpatients and 162 from outpatients; 325 of the isolates were Enterococcus faecalis, 61 E. faecium, seven E. avium, four each for E. raffinosus and, E. hirae; two, E. pseudoavium; and one each E. gallinarum, E. durans; E. mundtii, and E. faecales var asacharolyticus. Resistance to ampicillin and imipenem among E. faecium was 59%. Among E. faecalis, 0.3% were resistant to ampicillin and 2% to imipenem; no beta-lactamase production was detected. All were susceptible to vancomycin. Overall, a 12% high-level gentamicin resistance (HLGR) was found without a difference between species; 25% of bloodstream clinical isolates were HLGR enterococci. More than half (63%) of the HLGR clinical isolates were susceptible to streptomycin; a-hemolysis in human blood agar as well as nitrofurantoin resistance were observed in all E. faecium isolates and in two E. avium. CONCLUSIONS: In our center, HLGR has a prevalence of 12%. Streptomycin may be a therapeutic alternative in 63% of the HLGR cases. The pattern of hemolysis in human blood agar plus the susceptibility to nitrofurantoin could be used as an initial screening to identify enterococci.
AIM: To describe the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of enterococcal clinical isolates. SETTING: A 200-bed tertiary-care center in Mexico City. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective surveillance of enterococcal clinical isolates identified according to Facklam's method since 1990. Susceptibility tests were performed by a commercial micromethod, agar diffusion and microbroth dilution. We present data from 1990 to 1992. RESULTS: A total of 407 enterococci were recovered during the study period: 245 from inpatients and 162 from outpatients; 325 of the isolates were Enterococcus faecalis, 61 E. faecium, seven E. avium, four each for E. raffinosus and, E. hirae; two, E. pseudoavium; and one each E. gallinarum, E. durans; E. mundtii, and E. faecales var asacharolyticus. Resistance to ampicillin and imipenem among E. faecium was 59%. Among E. faecalis, 0.3% were resistant to ampicillin and 2% to imipenem; no beta-lactamase production was detected. All were susceptible to vancomycin. Overall, a 12% high-level gentamicin resistance (HLGR) was found without a difference between species; 25% of bloodstream clinical isolates were HLGR enterococci. More than half (63%) of the HLGR clinical isolates were susceptible to streptomycin; a-hemolysis in human blood agar as well as nitrofurantoin resistance were observed in all E. faecium isolates and in two E. avium. CONCLUSIONS: In our center, HLGR has a prevalence of 12%. Streptomycin may be a therapeutic alternative in 63% of the HLGR cases. The pattern of hemolysis in human blood agar plus the susceptibility to nitrofurantoin could be used as an initial screening to identify enterococci.