Literature DB >> 8815179

A standard test of heat-pain responses using CASE IV.

P J Dyck1, I R Zimmerman, D M Johnson, D Gillen, J L Hokanson, J L Karnes, G Gruener, P C O'Brien.   

Abstract

Heat-pain threshold and stimulus response characteristics can be evaluated with graduated heating pulses from a radiant heat source or a contact thermode. Results may be used to: (1) evaluate differences in sensation among anatomical sites, sides of the body, and with development and aging; and (2) provide an end-point for the study of the efficacy of drugs; or to follow the course of sensory alteration in disease (medical practice, epidemiologic studies, and controlled clinical trials). Because there is great variability in how tests of this kind are performed and scored, comparisons of results among medical centers are difficult. To meet this need, we have developed, and here describe, a standardized and validated test of heat-pain. We use both pyramidal and trapezoid-shaped stimuli. The range of stimulus magnitudes we recommend is sufficient to test heat-pain at a sensitive region (the face) of young people and an insensitive region (the foot) of healthy old people. From tests on healthy subjects and patients, we find that neither our previously published forced-choice or 4, 2, and 1 stepping algorithms are suitable for testing heat-pain sensation. We, therefore, introduce the Non-Repeating Ascending with Null Stimuli (NRA-NS) algorithm which performs satisfactorily. The graphed data points of responses to increasingly stronger heat pulses were made up of two components-the no pain (0) response line and the heat-pain response line (> or = 1 numerical scaling of the pain responses graded from 1 [least] to 10 [greatest]). For the pain responses, we found that usually a curve could be fit using a quadratic equation. Using this equation, or interpolation where necessary, it is possible to compute the heat-pain detection threshold (HPDT or HP:0.5), an intermediate heat-pain response (HP:5.0), and the difference between the two (HP:5.0-0.5). Our studies show that a certain time is needed between successive stimuli and tests to minimize changing basal skin temperature or threshold. We also demonstrated that low or high baseline skin temperatures can affect heat-pain responses, therefore, we advocate specific testing conditions. Based on a study of 25 healthy subjects, the reproducibility of the test falls within +/-1 stimulus steps 88% of the time for HP:5.0 and 76% of the time for HP:0.5. The precise approaches employed to make the test standard and reproducible are described. We illustrate that the algorithm and testing system is able to document altered pain threshold with skin abrasion, with intradermal injection of nerve growth factor, and with diabetic polyneuropathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8815179     DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(95)00277-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  16 in total

1.  A novel modelling and experimental technique to predict and measure tissue temperature during CO2 laser stimuli for human pain studies.

Authors:  Mohammed Hamed Al-Saadi; V Nadeau; M R Dickinson
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Impaired thermal perception in cluster headache.

Authors:  Jens Ellrich; Dejan Ristic; Sareh Said Yekta
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Quantitative assessment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  J D Greenspan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-04

4.  A modified Hargreaves' method for assessing threshold temperatures for heat nociception.

Authors:  Ratan K Banik; Rajiv A Kabadi
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Painless diabetic motor neuropathy: a variant of diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus Neuropathy?

Authors:  Mercedes Garces-Sanchez; Ruple S Laughlin; Peter J Dyck; JaNean K Engelstad; Jane E Norell; P James B Dyck
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Corneal confocal microscopy: a non-invasive surrogate of nerve fibre damage and repair in diabetic patients.

Authors:  R A Malik; P Kallinikos; C A Abbott; C H M van Schie; P Morgan; N Efron; A J M Boulton
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Pathophysiology of neuropathic pain in type 2 diabetes: skin denervation and contact heat-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chi-Chao Chao; Ming-Tsung Tseng; Ya-Ju Lin; Wei-Shiung Yang; Song-Chou Hsieh; Yea-Huey Lin; Ming-Jang Chiu; Yang-Chyuan Chang; Sung-Tsang Hsieh
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  The role of nerve growth factor in the prophylaxis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Elisavet K Tiaka; Nikolaos Papanas; Anastassios C Manolakis; Efstratios Maltezos
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2011-09-03

9.  Inflammation and neuropathic attacks in hereditary brachial plexus neuropathy.

Authors:  C J Klein; P J B Dyck; S M Friedenberg; T M Burns; A J Windebank; P J Dyck
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Local and Systemic Analgesic Effects of Nerve-Specific Acupuncture in Healthy Adults, Measured by Quantitative Sensory Testing.

Authors:  Alexandra Dimitrova; Dana Dharmakaya Colgan; Barry Oken
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.