Literature DB >> 8814778

Improving exposure assessment by monitoring human tissues for toxic chemicals.

J L Pirkle1, L L Needham, K Sexton.   

Abstract

Typically, the availability of appropriate data to estimate human exposures to toxic chemicals is scarce. Consequently, exposure assessments are often based on indirect surrogates of exposure, such as a combination of questionnaire data on time-activities and concentrations of toxic chemicals measured in environmental media (e.g., air, water, food, soil, dust). Recent advances, however, make it technically feasible and relatively affordable to measure low levels of multiple toxic chemicals in accessible human tissues (e.g., blood, urine). The increasing availability of biological markers for exposure, along with improvements in pharmacokinetic understanding, present new opportunities to estimate exposure from human tissue measurements and from knowledge of intake and uptake parameters. Biological monitoring provides exposure information that is usually complementary to the type of exposure information obtained from environmental monitoring. Biological and environmental monitoring can be used separately or together in order to meet desired objectives. We present here a discussion of the value of biological monitoring for improving exposure assessment. We emphasize the role of biological monitoring in identifying high-priority exposures, evaluating the effectiveness of intervention and prevention efforts, identifying at-risk subpopulations, recognizing time trends in population exposures, establishing reference ranges of tissue concentrations, and providing integrated dose measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8814778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  7 in total

1.  Human biomonitoring to optimize fish consumption advice: reducing uncertainty when evaluating benefits and risks.

Authors:  Scott M Arnold; Tracey V Lynn; Lori A Verbrugge; John P Middaugh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Tracking toxins. Biomonitoring outshines the indirect assessment of exposure in determining which pollulants enter the body, and whether they cause disease or disability.

Authors:  Barbara Scott Murdock
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Comparison of standard methods for assessing dietary intake of benzo[a]pyrene.

Authors:  Nicole C Deziel; Paul T Strickland; Elizabeth A Platz; Salahaddin Abubaker; Timothy J Buckley
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Urinary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolites as biomarkers to woodsmoke exposure - results from a controlled exposure study.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Debra Trinidad; Erin N Pittman; Erin A Riley; Andreas Sjodin; Russell L Dills; Michael Paulsen; Christopher D Simpson
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 5.  Human body burdens of chemicals used in plastic manufacture.

Authors:  Holger M Koch; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Optimal Exposure Biomarkers for Nonpersistent Chemicals in Environmental Epidemiology.

Authors:  Antonia M Calafat; Matthew P Longnecker; Holger M Koch; Shanna H Swan; Russ Hauser; Lynn R Goldman; Bruce P Lanphear; Ruthann A Rudel; Stephanie M Engel; Susan L Teitelbaum; Robin M Whyatt; Mary S Wolff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Biologic monitoring of exposure to environmental chemicals throughout the life stages: requirements and issues for consideration for the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Dana B Barr; Richard Y Wang; Larry L Needham
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.