Literature DB >> 8814613

Voltage dependence of mouse acetylcholine receptor gating: different charge movements in di-, mono- and unliganded receptors.

A Auerbach1, W Sigurdson, J Chen, G Akk.   

Abstract

1. The voltage dependence of binding and gating in wild-type and mutant recombinant mouse nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) was examined at the single-channel level. 2. The closing rate constant of diliganded receptors decreased e-fold with approximately 66 mV hyperpolarization in both wild-type (adult and embryonic) and mutant receptors. The opening rate constant of a mutant receptor (alpha Y93F) was not voltage dependent. 3. The voltage dependence of closing in monoliganded receptors was examined in several receptors having a mutation in the binding site (alpha G153S) or pore region (alpha L251C and epsilon T264P). The closing rate constant of these monoliganded receptors decreased e-fold with approximately 124 mV hyperpolarization. 4. The voltage dependence of closing and opening in unliganded receptors was examined in two receptors having a mutation in the pore region (alpha L251C and epsilon T264P). Neither the closing nor the opening rate constants of unliganded receptors were voltage dependent. 5. If z if the amount of charge that moves during channel closure and delta is the distance (as a fraction of the electric field) that the charge moves, we conclude that z delta = 0.4 in diliganded receptors, 0.2 in monoliganded receptors, and 0.0 in unliganded receptors. It is likely that charges on the protein, rather than the agonist molecule, move z delta = 0.2 after each ACh molecule has bound. 6. The results suggest that unliganded openings arise from a local, concerted change in the structure of the pore (channel opening) that does not involve the net movement of charged residues. We speculate that as a consequence of agonist binding, charged moieties in the protein change their disposition so that they move with respect to the electric field when the channel gates. The results are consistent with the idea that there is semi-independent movement of distinct domains during AChR gating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8814613      PMCID: PMC1160621          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  34 in total

1.  Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres.

Authors:  E Neher; B Sakmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Location of a delta-subunit region determining ion transport through the acetylcholine receptor channel.

Authors:  K Imoto; C Methfessel; B Sakmann; M Mishina; Y Mori; T Konno; K Fukuda; M Kurasaki; H Bujo; Y Fujita
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Dec 18-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  On the application of "a plausible model" of allosteric proteins to the receptor for acetylcholine.

Authors:  A Karlin
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Relaxation and fluctuations of membrane currents that flow through drug-operated channels.

Authors:  D Colquhoun; A G Hawkes
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1977-11-14

5.  Rates and equilibria at the acetylcholine receptor of Electrophorus electroplaques: a study of neurally evoked postsynaptic currents and of voltage-jump relaxations.

Authors:  R E Sheridan; H A Lester
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Kinetics of unliganded acetylcholine receptor channel gating.

Authors:  M B Jackson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents.

Authors:  K L Magleby; C F Stevens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  A quantitative description of end-plate currents.

Authors:  K L Magleby; C F Stevens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits.

Authors:  D E Koshland; G Némethy; D Filmer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Fast events in single-channel currents activated by acetylcholine and its analogues at the frog muscle end-plate.

Authors:  D Colquhoun; B Sakmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  33 in total

1.  Kinetic, mechanistic, and structural aspects of unliganded gating of acetylcholine receptor channels: a single-channel study of second transmembrane segment 12' mutants.

Authors:  C Grosman; A Auerbach
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Allosteric activation mechanism of the alpha 1 beta 2 gamma 2 gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor revealed by mutation of the conserved M2 leucine.

Authors:  Y Chang; D S Weiss
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Aromatics at the murine nicotinic receptor agonist binding site: mutational analysis of the alphaY93 and alphaW149 residues.

Authors:  G Akk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Structural elements near the C-terminus are responsible for changes in nicotinic receptor gating kinetics following patch excision.

Authors:  G Akk; J H Steinbach
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Slow-channel myasthenic syndrome caused by enhanced activation, desensitization, and agonist binding affinity attributable to mutation in the M2 domain of the acetylcholine receptor alpha subunit.

Authors:  M Milone; H L Wang; K Ohno; T Fukudome; J N Pruitt; N Bren; S M Sine; A G Engel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neuronal nicotinic threonine-for-leucine 247 alpha7 mutant receptors show different gating kinetics when activated by acetylcholine or by the noncompetitive agonist 5-hydroxytryptamine.

Authors:  E Palma; L Maggi; F Eusebi; R Miledi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Single channel properties of P2X2 purinoceptors.

Authors:  S Ding; F Sachs
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Conformation-dependent hydrophobic photolabeling of the nicotinic receptor: electrophysiology-coordinated photochemistry and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  John F Leite; Michael P Blanton; Mona Shahgholi; Dennis A Dougherty; Henry A Lester
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Free-energy landscapes of ion-channel gating are malleable: changes in the number of bound ligands are accompanied by changes in the location of the transition state in acetylcholine-receptor channels.

Authors:  Claudio Grosman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Aromatic Residues {epsilon}Trp-55 and {delta}Trp-57 and the Activation of Acetylcholine Receptor Channels.

Authors:  Pallavi A Bafna; Archana Jha; Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.