PURPOSE: To identify predictors of outcome of epilepsy surgery, using the Duke experience, applying multivariate analysis and validation techniques. To compare the results of different modeling algorithms. Few previous studies have reported multivariate analysis, or validated their results. METHODS: Records of 116 patients with focal resections for intractable epilepsy from January 1, 1980 through June 30, 1989 were analyzed. Primary outcome variable was patient's condition in second postoperative year: seizure free (except auras), or not. Three predictors of biologic interest were specified a priori for confirmatory analysis. Additional predictors were considered within exploratory analysis. Logistic regression techniques were applied to assess relations with pre- and postoperative predictors. Internal validity was assessed by repeated random selection of training and validation samples, used in conjunction with bootstrap techniques. RESULTS: By using multivariate analysis, percentage of epileptic EEG activity arising from the site of resection and either imaging localization or lack of use of invasive monitoring were the only statistically significant preoperative predictors for good outcome at 2 years. Presence of seizures within 2 months of surgery was a significant postoperative predictor for a poor outcome. Adding more variables did not result in significantly improved models. Use of validation techniques reduced the degree of optimism in the predictive value of the models. CONCLUSIONS: Pooling of data from multiple institutions is needed to attain the large sample sizes needed for multivariate analysis with validation.
PURPOSE: To identify predictors of outcome of epilepsy surgery, using the Duke experience, applying multivariate analysis and validation techniques. To compare the results of different modeling algorithms. Few previous studies have reported multivariate analysis, or validated their results. METHODS: Records of 116 patients with focal resections for intractable epilepsy from January 1, 1980 through June 30, 1989 were analyzed. Primary outcome variable was patient's condition in second postoperative year: seizure free (except auras), or not. Three predictors of biologic interest were specified a priori for confirmatory analysis. Additional predictors were considered within exploratory analysis. Logistic regression techniques were applied to assess relations with pre- and postoperative predictors. Internal validity was assessed by repeated random selection of training and validation samples, used in conjunction with bootstrap techniques. RESULTS: By using multivariate analysis, percentage of epileptic EEG activity arising from the site of resection and either imaging localization or lack of use of invasive monitoring were the only statistically significant preoperative predictors for good outcome at 2 years. Presence of seizures within 2 months of surgery was a significant postoperative predictor for a poor outcome. Adding more variables did not result in significantly improved models. Use of validation techniques reduced the degree of optimism in the predictive value of the models. CONCLUSIONS: Pooling of data from multiple institutions is needed to attain the large sample sizes needed for multivariate analysis with validation.
Authors: Carmen Barba; F Doglietto; L De Luca; G Faraca; C Marra; M Meglio; G F Rossi; G Colicchio Journal: J Neurol Date: 2005-02-23 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Daniel M Goldenholz; Alexander Jow; Omar I Khan; Anto Bagić; Susumu Sato; Sungyoung Auh; Conrad Kufta; Sara Inati; William H Theodore Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: M J Hennessy; R D Elwes; M Honavar; S Rabe-Hesketh; C D Binnie; C E Polkey Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: T Kral; H Clusmann; I Blümcke; R Fimmers; B Ostertun; M Kurthen; J Schramm Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Nishant Sinha; Justin Dauwels; Marcus Kaiser; Sydney S Cash; M Brandon Westover; Yujiang Wang; Peter N Taylor Journal: Brain Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 13.501