Literature DB >> 8813964

Kappa statistics as indicators of quality assurance in histopathology and cytopathology.

S S Cross1.   

Abstract

Kappa statistics are widely-used to assess performance in quality assurance schemes. Low values, however, are difficult to interpret, especially when confidence intervals have not been calculated. A model of a dichotomous decision in pathology (benignancy or malignancy in fine needle aspirates of the breast) was used to calculate kappa statistics (with confidence limits) for increasing false positive rates. It was found that the level at which the upper 95% confidence interval for the kappa statistic fell below 1 was an insensitive method of detecting unsatisfactory performance as at that level the false positive rate was unacceptably high (> 1%) for all populations of specimens less than 800 in number. Either large populations of samples are required in quality assurance schemes which use kappa statistics (which may well be impractical) or other methods of assessing performance, possibly with weighted outcomes, are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8813964      PMCID: PMC500580          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.49.7.597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  9 in total

1.  Some issues in observer error studies in pathology.

Authors:  P Silcocks
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.996

2.  Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic.

Authors:  H Svanholm; H Starklint; H J Gundersen; J Fabricius; H Barlebo; S Olsen
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.205

3.  Histopathological evaluation of colonic mucosal biopsy specimens in chronic inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic implications.

Authors:  C A Seldenrijk; B C Morson; S G Meuwissen; N W Schipper; J Lindeman; C J Meijer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Interpretation of low kappa values.

Authors:  D K Donker; A Hasman; H P van Geijn
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1993-07

6.  Information and observer disagreement in histopathology.

Authors:  J A Morris
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Measuring repeatability and validity of histological diagnosis--a brief review with some practical examples.

Authors:  P B Silcocks
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Response analysis in histopathology external quality assessment schemes.

Authors:  P N Furness; I Lauder
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Observer variation in the assessment of chronic gastritis according to the Sydney system.

Authors:  A Andrew; J I Wyatt; M F Dixon
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.087

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Observer accuracy in estimating proportions in images: implications for the semiquantitative assessment of staining reactions and a proposal for a new system.

Authors:  S S Cross
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Offline telepathology diagnosis of colorectal polyps: a study of interobserver agreement and comparison with glass slide diagnoses.

Authors:  S S Cross; J L Burton; A K Dubé; K M Feeley; P D Lumb; T J Stephenson; R D Start
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Light microscopic histology of quadriceps tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Angelo Del Buono; Filippo Spiezia; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Automated early detection of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Michael D Abràmoff; Joseph M Reinhardt; Stephen R Russell; James C Folk; Vinit B Mahajan; Meindert Niemeijer; Gwénolé Quellec
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Skeletal muscle pathology in endurance athletes with acquired training intolerance.

Authors:  L A Grobler; M Collins; M I Lambert; C Sinclair-Smith; W Derman; A St Clair Gibson; T D Noakes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  IIB or not IIB, part 2: assessing inter-rater and intra-rater repeatability of the Kenney-Doig scale in equine endometrial biopsy evaluation.

Authors:  Jane Westendorf; Bruce Wobeser; Tasha Epp
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 1.279

Review 7.  Principles for valid histopathologic scoring in research.

Authors:  K N Gibson-Corley; A K Olivier; D K Meyerholz
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.221

8.  Fundamental Concepts for Semiquantitative Tissue Scoring in Translational Research.

Authors:  David K Meyerholz; Amanda P Beck
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-01

Review 9.  Grading systems in head and neck dysplasia: their prognostic value, weaknesses and utility.

Authors:  Stijn Fleskens; Piet Slootweg
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2009-05-11

10.  Integrative metabolic and transcriptomic profiling of prostate cancer tissue containing reactive stroma.

Authors:  Maria K Andersen; Kjersti Rise; Guro F Giskeødegård; Elin Richardsen; Helena Bertilsson; Øystein Størkersen; Tone F Bathen; Morten Rye; May-Britt Tessem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.