Literature DB >> 8813921

Urethroplasty for posterior urethral strictures.

A R Mundy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term results and complications of urethroplasty for patients with pelvic fracture injuries of the posterior urethra and to determine which type of of procedure is most appropriate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients were followed prospectively after undergoing transperineal bulboprostatic anastomotic urethroplasty (AU). The results and complications in these patients were compared with 59 patients who had a 'patch' urethroplasty (PU) for a short stricture which in other circumstances might have been amenable to AU.
RESULTS: The 1-, 5- and 10-year re-stricture rates were 7, 12 and 12%, respectively, for AU and 12, 20 and 31% for PU. Four of the 10 patients who re-strictured during the 5-year follow-up after AU were > 55 years of age and four of the seven patients who had an AU and who were > 55 years old re-strictured. All the patients who re-strictured were impotent. The commonest complications after AU were principally a consequence of the original injury rather than the surgery, whereas the complications after PU were principally related to the surgery. Impotence sometimes occurred after both types of urethroplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic urethroplasty is the best available procedure for traumatic proximal urethral strictures but was not tolerated well in the elderly and caused impotence in a small but significant proportion. The results of PU were less satisfactory and the difference became progressively more marked with a longer follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8813921     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.11617.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Urethral trauma].

Authors:  G-M Pinggera; P Rehder; G Bartsch; C Gozzi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Outcome of urethral strictures managed by general surgeons in a rural setting of India.

Authors:  Bhushan N Wani; Suhas N Jajoo; Anil M Bhole
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  Urologic trauma guidelines: a 21st century update.

Authors:  Richard A Santucci; Jamie M Bartley
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  The use of suprapubic cystoscopy in perineal urethroplasty.

Authors:  Rahim Horuz; Cemal Göktaş; Ali Cihangir Çetinel; Oktay Akça; Ahmet Selimoğlu; Selami Albayrak
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-12

5.  3D printing of pelvic fracture urethral injuries-fusion of technology and urethroplasty.

Authors:  Pankaj M Joshi; Sanjay B Kulkarni
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-11-14

Review 6.  Management of posterior urethral disruption injuries.

Authors:  Jeremy B Myers; Jack W McAninch
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2009-03

Review 7.  Reconstruction of Membranous Urethral Strictures.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Reynaldo G Gómez; Dmitriy Nikolavsky
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Sexual (Dys)function after Urethroplasty.

Authors:  Luís Xambre
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2016-03-09

Review 9.  Treatment of posterior urethral distractions defects following pelvic fracture.

Authors:  Emilio Ríos; Luís Martínez-Piñeiro
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2017-12-27

Review 10.  Pelvic fracture urethral injury in males-mechanisms of injury, management options and outcomes.

Authors:  Rachel C Barratt; Jason Bernard; Anthony R Mundy; Tamsin J Greenwell
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.