Literature DB >> 8813899

Mode of action of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a feed additive for ruminants.

C J Newbold1, R J Wallace, F M McIntosh.   

Abstract

Two suggested modes of action of yeast in stimulating rumen fermentation were investigated. The first, that yeast respiratory activity protects anaerobic rumen bacteria from damage by O2, was tested using different strains of yeast that had previously been shown to have differing abilities to increase the viable count of rumen bacteria. Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC 240, NCYC 1026, and the commercial product Yea-Sacc, added to rumen fluid in vitro at 1.3 mg/ml, increased the rate of O2 disappearance by between 46 and 89%. The same three preparations also stimulated bacterial numbers in an in vitro fermenter (Rusitec). S. cerevisiae NCYC 694 and NCYC 1088, which had no influence on the viable count in Rusitec, also had no effect on O2 uptake. Respiration-deficient (RD) mutants of S. cerevisiae NCYC 240 and NCYC 1026 were enriched by repeated culturing in the presence of ethidium bromide. S. cerevisiae NCYC 240 and NCYC 1026 stimulated the total and cellulolytic bacterial populations in Rusitec, while the corresponding RD mutants did not. Rigorous precautions to exclude air from Rusitec resulted in S. cerevisiae NCYC 240 no longer stimulating total bacterial numbers, although it still increased numbers of cellulolytic bacteria. The second hypothesis, that yeast provides malic and other dicarboxylic acids which stimulate the growth of some rumen bacteria, was examined by comparing the effects of yeast and malic acid on rumen fermentation in sheep. Three mature sheep were given 0.85 kg barley/d plus 0.55 kg chopped ryegrass hay/d either unsupplemented, or supplemented with 4 g S. cerevisiae NCYC 240/d or 100 mg L-malic acid/d either mixed with the diet or in aqueous solution infused continuously into the rumen. Yeast increased the total viable count of bacteria (P < 0.05) whereas malic acid did not, and no other effect of the treatments reached statistical significance. It was concluded, therefore, that the stimulation of rumen bacteria by S. cerevisiae is at least partly dependent on its respiratory activity, and is not mediated by malic acid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8813899     DOI: 10.1079/bjn19960029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  25 in total

Review 1.  Effects and immune responses of probiotic treatment in ruminants.

Authors:  Sarah Raabis; Wenli Li; Laura Cersosimo
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 2.046

Review 2.  Role of probiotics in ruminant nutrition as natural modulators of health and productivity of animals in tropical countries: an overview.

Authors:  Nitish A Kulkarni; H S Chethan; Rashika Srivastava; Anil B Gabbur
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Effects of a multicomponent microbial feed additive containing prebiotics and probiotics on health, immune status, metabolism, and performance of newly weaned beef steers during a 35-d receiving period.

Authors:  Modoluwamu D Idowu; Godstime Taiwo; Andres Pech Cervantes; Scott A Bowdridge; Ibukun M Ogunade
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-03

4.  Effect of plant oils and organic acids on rumen fermentation in vitro.

Authors:  D Jalc; S Kisidayová; F Nerud
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Comparative effects of two multispecies direct-fed microbial products on energy status, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal fermentation, bacterial community, and metabolome of beef steers.

Authors:  Ibukun M Ogunade; Megan McCoun; Modoluwamu D Idowu; Sunday O Peters
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effects of Disodium Fumarate on In Vitro Rumen Fermentation, The Production of Lipopolysaccharide and Biogenic Amines, and The Rumen Bacterial Community.

Authors:  Wei Jin; Chunxu Xue; Junhua Liu; Yuyang Yin; Weiyun Zhu; Shengyong Mao
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Supplementation and Anhydrous Ammonia Treatment of Wheat Straw on In-situ Degradability and, Rumen Fermentation and Growth Performance of Yearling Lambs.

Authors:  Muazzez Cömert; Yılmaz Şayan; Hülya Özelçam; Gülşah Yeğenoğlu Baykal
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 8.  Selected Alternative Feed Additives Used to Manipulate the Rumen Microbiome.

Authors:  Marta Michalak; Konrad Wojnarowski; Paulina Cholewińska; Natalia Szeligowska; Marcel Bawej; Jakub Pacoń
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The effects of a probiotic yeast on the bacterial diversity and population structure in the rumen of cattle.

Authors:  Eric Pinloche; Neil McEwan; Jean-Philippe Marden; Corinne Bayourthe; Eric Auclair; C Jamie Newbold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  An Introduction to the Avian Gut Microbiota and the Effects of Yeast-Based Prebiotic-Type Compounds as Potential Feed Additives.

Authors:  Stephanie M Roto; Peter M Rubinelli; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.