Literature DB >> 8813408

ERPs during study as a function of subsequent direct and indirect memory testing in young and old adults.

D Friedman1, W Ritter, J G Snodgrass.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from young and older adults while words were studied during structural and semantic encoding tasks. Items were presented twice to assess repetition effects. Subsequent memory effects (i.e. Dm or difference in subsequent memory) associated with non-target study items were also evaluated. Memory for non-target study items was tested either indirectly (word stem completion) or directly (cued recall). There were small, but unreliable age differences (favoring the young) on both the indirect and direct tests. These small differences were consistent with previous results for stem completion performance, but were counter to expectation for the cued recall test, where young adults were expected to show clear superiority. We conclude, based on task considerations, that for cued recall, subjects may have adopted an 'implicit' retrieval strategy. Because older adults typically have little difficulty with implicit retrieval, they fared almost as well as the young on cued recall. Dm effects were reliable for the young only. As Dm is thought to reflect elaborative encoding processes, the larger Dm magnitudes in the young than the old suggest that the small, though unreliable, age-related performance differences that resulted may have been mediated by such elaborative processing on the part of the younger adults.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8813408     DOI: 10.1016/0926-6410(95)00041-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  10 in total

1.  Age effects on brain activity during repetition priming of targets and distracters.

Authors:  Adam L Lawson; Chunyan Guo; Yang Jiang
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Event-related potentials reveal age differences in the encoding and recognition of scenes.

Authors:  Angela H Gutchess; Yoko Ieuji; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Memory systems do not divide on consciousness: Reinterpreting memory in terms of activation and binding.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Heekyeong Park; Paul D Kieffaber
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Tracking neural correlates of successful learning over repeated sequence observations.

Authors:  Natalie A Steinemann; Clara Moisello; M Felice Ghilardi; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Age-independent and age-dependent neural substrate for single-digit multiplication and addition arithmetic problems.

Authors:  Xinlin Zhou; James R Booth; Jiayan Lu; Hui Zhao; Brian Butterworth; Chuansheng Chen; Qi Dong
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 6.  When encoding yields remembering: insights from event-related neuroimaging.

Authors:  A D Wagner; W Koutstaal; D L Schacter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Distinct patterns of neural activity during memory formation of nonwords versus words.

Authors:  Leun J Otten; Josefin Sveen; Angela H Quayle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Adapting event-related potential research paradigms for children: Considerations from research on the development of recognition memory.

Authors:  Leslie Rollins; Tracy Riggins
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.531

9.  Memory recall in arousing situations - an emotional von Restorff effect?

Authors:  Daniel Wiswede; Jascha Rüsseler; Simone Hasselbach; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 10.  What makes deeply encoded items memorable? Insights into the levels of processing framework from neuroimaging and neuromodulation.

Authors:  Giulia Galli
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.