Literature DB >> 8813305

Risk factors and fetal outcome in cases of shoulder dystocia compared with normal deliveries of a similar birthweight.

A M Bahar1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare risk factors and fetal morbidity in deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia with deliveries of similar infant birthweights but not complicated by shoulder dystocia.
DESIGN: A retrospective case-controlled study.
SETTING: Kuwait Maternity Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-nine cases of true shoulder dystocia and 138 controls matched for exact infant's birthweight.
METHODS: Demographic data and data regarding history of previous shoulder dystocia, diabetes mellitus, labour course, method of delivery and newborns' condition were collected from patients and case notes following delivery. The mothers' height and weight were measured. Oral glucose tolerance test were performed on patients who were not known as diabetics. The infants' head and chest circumferences and bisacromial diameter were measured.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between cases and controls when mean age, parity, height, weight and gestational ages were compared. The cases demonstrated a higher incidence of previous shoulder dystocia (P < 0.01), diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001), use of oxytocin for acceleration of labour (P < 0.01) and operative vaginal deliveries (P < 0.01). Differences between cases and controls in their newborn infants' head and chest circumferences were not significant, but the newborns of cases have a longer mean bisacromial diameter and a shorter head circumference:bisacromial diameter ratio (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Thirty-seven infants (53.6%) from cases and two from controls (1.4%) sustained birth injuries. There were two stillbirths among the cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Although fetal macrosomia is the principal risk factor for shoulder dystocia, other important risk factors include diabetes mellitus, previous history of shoulder dystocia, prolonged labour, delay in the second stage of labour and fetal shoulder width which appear to be independent of fetal weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8813305     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09904.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  6 in total

1.  Association of head circumference and shoulder dystocia in macrosomic neonates.

Authors:  Austin Larson; David E Mandelbaum
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-04

2.  Risk factors profile of shoulder dystocia in oman: a case control study.

Authors:  Maha M Al-Khaduri; Rania Mohammed Abudraz; Sayed G Rizvi; Yahya M Al-Farsi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2014-09

3.  The efficacy and safety of inflatable obstetric belts for management of the second stage of labor.

Authors:  Jin Hee Kang; Gun Ho Lee; Young Bae Park; Hye Sun Jun; Kyoung Jin Lee; Won Bo Hahn; Sang Won Park; Hee Jin Park; Dong Hyun Cha
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Association of Fetal Abdominal-Head Circumference Size Difference With Shoulder Dystocia: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Loraine Endres; Emily DeFranco; Theresa Conyac; Marci Adams; Ying Zhou; Kristin Magner; Luke O'Rourke; Kiley A Bernhard; Danish Siddiqui; Anna McCormick; Jacques Abramowicz; Ronald Merkel; Rana Jawish; Mounira Habli; Alissa Floman; Everett F Magann; Suneet P Chauhan
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2015-04-27

5.  Sonographic Estimated Fetal Weight among Diabetics at ≥ 34 Weeks and Composite Neonatal Morbidity.

Authors:  Leen Al-Hafez; Michael L Pirics; Suneet P Chauhan
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2018-06-11

Review 6.  Fetal Growth Acceleration-Current Approach to the Big Baby Issue.

Authors:  Jan Modzelewski; Anna Kajdy; Katarzyna Muzyka-Placzyńska; Dorota Sys; Michał Rabijewski
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.