Literature DB >> 881256

A comparison of the stability of proplast-coated and cemented Thompson prostheses in the treatment of subcapital femoral fractures.

B Sadr, G P Arden.   

Abstract

Twenty randomly selected patients with displaced subcapital fractures of the femur, were treated with prosthetic replacement of the femoral head using a Thompson prosthesis of which the intramedullary portion was coated with Proplast. The results were compared with a control group of 20 similar patients in whom the standard Thompson prosthesis was used with acrylic cement. At follow-up, which ranged from 3 to 17 months, there was substantial X-ray evidence of prosthetic loosening in the Proplast series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 881256     DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(77)90137-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  9 in total

1.  Orthopedic prosthesis fixation.

Authors:  J B Park
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Jamie Stokes; Jonathan A Cook; William Gp Eardley; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 3.  Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Martyn J Parker; Jonathan A Cook; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 4.  The Effect of Type of Femoral Component Fixation on Mortality and Morbidity after Hip Hemiarthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Imam; Mohamed Shehata; Mahmoud Morsi; Muhammad Shawqi; Ahmed Elsehili; Paul Trikha; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Ashwin Unnithan; Arshad Khaleel; Puneet Monga; Ali Narvani; Asser Sallam
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-08-05

5.  Essential design considerations for microporous implants: preliminary communication.

Authors:  H U Cameron
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 18.000

6.  Letter to the editor: cemented hemiarthroplasty confers less pain and better mobility than uncemented hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Xun-Zi Cai; Xian-Zhen Chen; Shi-Gui Yan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Li; Qianyu Zhuang; Xisheng Weng; Lei Zhou; Yanyan Bian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mortality and revision rate of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty after hip fracture: an analysis of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).

Authors:  Bouke J Duijnisveld; Koen L M Koenraadt; Liza N van Steenbergen; Stefan B T Bolder
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with displaced fracture of the femoral neck: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Binfeng Liu; Ang Li; Jialin Wang; Hongbo Wang; Gongwei Zhai; Haohao Ma; Xiaoyu Lian; Bo Zhang; Liyun Liu; Yanzheng Gao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.