Literature DB >> 8811761

Deprivation payments to general practitioners: limitations of census data.

F A Majeed1, D Martin, T Crayford.   

Abstract

The census data from which deprivation payments have been calculated since June 1995 suffer from limitations including underenumeration; under counting of homeless people and refugees, and artefactual errors because of the way in which the 1991 census data were tabulated. These limitations reduced the fairness of the changes that many practices experienced in their deprivation payments. The validity of the current system of deprivation payments would be improved if these limitations were borne in mind when allocating payments to practices and if enumeration districts were used as the basis of payments rather than electoral wards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8811761      PMCID: PMC2351975          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7058.669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  5 in total

1.  Analysis from inner London of deprivation payments based on enumeration districts rather than wards.

Authors:  T Crayford; J Shanks; M Bajekal; S Langford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-23

2.  Deprivation payments to general practitioners.

Authors:  F A Majeed
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-24

3.  Using data from the 1991 census.

Authors:  F A Majeed; D G Cook; J Poloniecki; D Martin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-10

4.  Deprivation payments should be based on enumeration districts.

Authors:  A Hastings
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-20

5.  Public health and the 1991 census.

Authors:  V S Raleigh; R Balarajan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-30
  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  The impact of area deprivation on differences in health: does the choice of the geographical classification matter?

Authors:  S A Reijneveld; R A Verheij; D H de Bakker
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Unequal to the task: deprivation, health and UK general practice at the millennium.

Authors:  N Beale
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Rationale for the new GP deprivation payment scheme in England: effects of moving from electoral ward to enumeration district underprivileged area scores.

Authors:  M Bajekal; B Alves; B Jarman; B Hurwitz
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The impact of hepatitis C in general practice.

Authors:  S Singh; R Miller; S Madge; D Patch
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Refugees, asylum seekers, and general practice: room for improvement?

Authors:  S Hargreaves; A Holmes; J S Friedland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  More equitable systems for allocating general practice deprivation payments: financial consequences.

Authors:  D O'Reilly; K Steele
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Refugees and primary care: tackling the inequalities.

Authors:  D Jones; P S Gill
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-21

8.  Deprivation payments and workload.

Authors:  D Hannay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Trends in colorectal cancer care in southern England, 1989-1993: using HES data to inform cancer services reviews.

Authors:  A M Pollock; N Vickers
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Does Council Tax Valuation Band (CTVB) correlate with Under-Privileged Area 8 (UPA8) score and could it be a better 'Jarman Index'?

Authors:  N Beale; G Taylor; D Straker-Cook
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.