Literature DB >> 8810691

Skull base erosion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: detection by CT and MRI.

V F Chong1, Y F Fan.   

Abstract

It is generally accepted that computed tomography (CT) is superior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in demonstrating bony erosion while MRI is better in delineating soft tissue abnormality. The ability to detect skull base erosion by CT and MRI was compared in a retrospective study of 114 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Involvement of the following structures was demonstrated on CT and MRI: pterygoid plates [CT--10 (9%) patients, MRI--8 (7%) patients]; pterygoid process [CT--22 (19%) patients, MRI--22 (19%) patients]; clivus [CT--17 (15%) patients, MRI--26 (23%) patients]; petrous apex [CT--20 (18%) patients, MRI--34 (30%) patients]; sphenoid body/sinus [CT--31 (27%) patients, MRI--32 (28%) patients]; sphenoid wing [CT--12 (11%) patients, MRI--16 (14%) patients]. Erosion of the foramen ovale could be seen on CT in 19 (17%) patients but tumour was noted in the foramen in 28 (25%) patients using MRI. Contrary to common belief, MRI appears to be more sensitive in detecting bony involvement in the petrous apex, the clivus and the sphenoid wing. MRI is, therefore, the preferred technique in demonstrating skull base involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8810691     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80056-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  9 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the head and neck.

Authors:  Ann Dorothy King; Kunwar Suryaveer Singh Bhatia
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-28

2.  MRI-detected skull-base invasion: prognostic value and therapeutic implication in intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yi-Kan Cheng; Li-Zhi Liu; Ning Jiang; Dan Yue; Ling-Long Tang; Fan Zhang; Li Lin; Xu Liu; Lei Chen; Jun Ma
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  A D King; A C Vlantis; R K Y Tsang; T M K Gary; A K Y Au; C Y Chan; S Y Kok; W T Kwok; H K Lui; A T Ahuja
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  A new T staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on intensity-modulated radiation therapy: results from a prospective multicentric clinical study.

Authors:  Min Kang; Pingting Zhou; Tingting Wei; Tingting Zhao; Jianxiong Long; Guisheng Li; Haolin Yan; Guosheng Feng; Meilian Liu; Jinxian Zhu; Rensheng Wang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Bone Subtraction Iodine Imaging Using Area Detector CT for Evaluation of Skull Base Invasion by Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  T Hiyama; H Kuno; K Sekiya; S Tsushima; O Sakai; M Kusumoto; T Kobayashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  MR imaging prediction of local control of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiation therapy and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Y Wang; H Zhao; Z-Q Zhang; L-L Huang; Y Ye; Y-B Wang; M-J Han
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Impact of primary tumor volume and location on the prognosis of patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yun-Ming Tian; Wei-Wei Xiao; Li Bai; Xue-Wen Liu; Chong Zhao; Tai-Xiang Lu; Fei Han
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-10

8.  CT-diagnosed severe skull base bone destruction predicts distant bone metastasis in early N-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Yi; Zhi-Gang Liu; Xian Li; Jiao Tang; Chang-Bin Jiang; Jing-Ye Hu; Zi-Wei Tu; Hui Wang; Dao-Li Niu; Yun-Fei Xia
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The skull base in oncologic imaging.

Authors:  V Chong
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 3.909

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.