Literature DB >> 8810041

Synchronization affector of autonomous short-period-sustained oscillation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

M Keulers1, A D Satroutdinov, T Suzuki, H Kuriyama.   

Abstract

When the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was grown under aerobic continuous culture, an autonomous short-period-sustained oscillation appeared. This oscillation was observed in concentrations of various extracellular and intracellular parameters, such as ethanol, acetate, glycogen, dissolved oxygen and intracellular pH. In this work the synchronization affecter of this oscillation was investigated. Ethanol was found not to be the synchronizer of the oscillation because a pulse of ethanol did not affect the phase or period of the oscillation. The oscillation was dependent on the aeration rate, i.e., the oscillation occurred only between 150 and 600 ml min-1. However, the oxygen concentration did not influence synchronization as an upward shift in the oxygen concentration of the gas flow did not affect the sustainability of the oscillation. On the other hand, synchronization was stopped by an enhanced gas flow rate, keeping dissolved oxygen tension at the oscillatory condition, suggesting that synchronization was caused by a volatile compound in the culture. A stepwise increase in carbon dioxide concentration of the gas flow rate ceased synchronization, yet the oscillation seem to continue in each individual cell. Oscillatory behaviour of intracellular pH and carbon dioxide evolution rate showed a phase difference of 90 degrees. Based on these facts it is postulated that carbon dioxide, through the influence of its dissociation on intracellular pH, could be the synchronization affector of the autonomous short-period-sustained oscillation of S. cerevisiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8810041     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0061(19960615)12:7<673::aid-yea958>3.0.co;2-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yeast        ISSN: 0749-503X            Impact factor:   3.239


  9 in total

1.  Effect of cellular interaction on glycolytic oscillations in yeast: a theoretical investigation.

Authors:  J Wolf; R Heinrich
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Genome wide oscillations in expression. Wavelet analysis of time series data from yeast expression arrays uncovers the dynamic architecture of phenotype.

Authors:  R R Klevecz; D B Murray
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Clustering in cell cycle dynamics with general response/signaling feedback.

Authors:  Todd R Young; Bastien Fernandez; Richard Buckalew; Gregory Moses; Erik M Boczko
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Regulation of yeast oscillatory dynamics.

Authors:  Douglas B Murray; Manfred Beckmann; Hiroaki Kitano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Clock control of ultradian respiratory oscillation found during yeast continuous culture.

Authors:  D B Murray; S Roller; H Kuriyama; D Lloyd
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Cell cycle dynamics: clustering is universal in negative feedback systems.

Authors:  Nathan Breitsch; Gregory Moses; Erik Boczko; Todd Young
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Gts1p stabilizes oscillations in energy metabolism by activating the transcription of TPS1 encoding trehalose-6-phosphate synthase 1 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zhaojun Xu; So-ichi Yaguchi; Kunio Tsurugi
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Noise-induced dispersion and breakup of clusters in cell cycle dynamics.

Authors:  Xue Gong; Gregory Moses; Alexander B Neiman; Todd Young
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Temporal metabolic partitioning of the yeast and protist cellular networks: the cell is a global scale-invariant (fractal or self-similar) multioscillator.

Authors:  David Lloyd; Douglas B Murray; Miguel A Aon; Sonia Cortassa; Marc R Roussel; Manfred Beckmann; Robert K Poole
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.170

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.