Literature DB >> 8809894

The impact of prenatal diagnosis on NTD surveillance.

W P Allen1, R E Stevenson, S J Thompson, J H Dean.   

Abstract

Active and passive surveillance methods were utilized in an attempt to identify all neural tube defect (NTD)-affected pregnancies in South Carolina, a state previously identified to have a high prevalence of these defects (Greenberg et al., 1983). Sources of case ascertainment included maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) programmes, prenatal diagnosis (amniocentesis) programmes, physician offices, perinatal centres, hospital medical record departments, and vital records. One hundred and nine NTD cases were identified over 24 months, indicating a prevalence of 1.60 cases per 1000 recorded births and fetal deaths (surveillance 1 October 1992-30 September 1994). Fifty-three (49 per cent) of the 109 NTD-affected pregnancies were either spontaneously or electively aborted prior to 26 weeks' gestation. Only three (6 per cent) of these early termination NTD cases were recorded in vital records, while medical records recorded 40 cases (75 per cent). By monitoring MSAFP programmes and maintaining frequent contact with physician offices and perinatal centres, 85 per cent of these early termination NTD-affected pregnancies were identified. However, for complete ascertainment of NTD-affected pregnancies, the utilization of all of these ascertainment methods was necessary, as each ascertainment method identified NTD cases missed by the other methods. Consideration of the significant impact of prenatal diagnosis on NTD surveillance and the use of multiple ascertainment methods in an attempt at complete ascertainment is particularly important now because of the recent recommendation for the periconceptional use of folic acid to prevent neural tube defects and the need for epidemiological studies to monitor the effectiveness of this prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8809894     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199606)16:6<531::AID-PD914>3.0.CO;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

1.  Incidence of neural tube defects in Ontario, 1986-1999.

Authors:  Enza Gucciardi; Mary-Anne Pietrusiak; Donna L Reynolds; Jocelyn Rouleau
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-08-06       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The impact of prenatal diagnosis on neural tube defect (NTD) pregnancy versus birth incidence in British Columbia.

Authors:  Margot I Van Allen; Erin Boyle; Paul Thiessen; Deborah McFadden; Douglas Cochrane; G Keith Chambers; Sylvie Langlois; Patricia Stathers; Beverly Irwin; Elizabeth Cairns; Patrick MacLeod; Marie-France Delisle; Soo-Hong Uh
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Long term maintenance of neural tube defects prevention in a high prevalence state.

Authors:  Julianne S Collins; Kristy K Atkinson; Jane H Dean; Robert G Best; Roger E Stevenson
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 4.  Global Birth Prevalence of Spina Bifida by Folic Acid Fortification Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Callie A M Atta; Kirsten M Fiest; Alexandra D Frolkis; Nathalie Jette; Tamara Pringsheim; Christine St Germaine-Smith; Thilinie Rajapakse; Gilaad G Kaplan; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Neurosurgical Interventions for Occipital Encephalocele.

Authors:  Lal Rehman; Ghulam Farooq; Irum Bukhari
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

6.  Descriptive epidemiology of selected birth defects, areas of Lombardy, Italy, 1999.

Authors:  Giovanna Tagliabue; Roberto Tessandori; Fausta Caramaschi; Sabrina Fabiano; Anna Maghini; Andrea Tittarelli; Daniele Vergani; Maria Bellotti; Salvatore Pisani; Maria Letizia Gambino; Emanuela Frassoldi; Enrica Costa; Daniela Gada; Paolo Crosignani; Paolo Contiero
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2007-05-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.